Re: IEC 60950 fire enclosure openings

2007-06-03 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
' Subject: Re: IEC 60950 fire enclosure openings My attempt to put aside the access rules got in the way of the question. Another way of putting it is, if you have a solid top which overhangs the bottom by the 5 degrees, there is no limit to the size of the side opening. It appears the opening can

RE: IEC 60950 fire enclosure openings

2007-06-03 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
requirements. I am advising that you cannot win with a certification house that no side is required. Best regards, Rich From: Robert Johnson [mailto:john...@itesafety.com] Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2007 8:19 PM To: ri...@ieee.org Cc: 'ieee' Subject: Re: IEC 60950 fire enclosure openings

Re: IEC 60950 fire enclosure openings

2007-06-03 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
My attempt to put aside the access rules got in the way of the question. Another way of putting it is, if you have a solid top which overhangs the bottom by the 5 degrees, there is no limit to the size of the side opening. It appears the opening can be the size of the side. In other words, is

RE: IEC 60950 fire enclosure openings

2007-06-01 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Hi Bob: Been there, done that. Regardless whether the requirements for side and top openings APPEAR from the text to be for prevention of electric shock, they also apply to fire enclosures. The way the standard is written, the text appears to not require a fire enclosure for the sides