Re: Keep off the grass: RF emissions!

2001-10-30 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Lothar Schmidt wrote (in <5EFB06767D7DD211828C0008C74CE95B414D40@CALVIN>) about 'Keep off the grass: RF emissions!', on Mon, 29 Oct 2001: >I guess the EN 55014-1,2 would be more applicable regarding EMC in Europe. They are written very largely around products that have a

RE: Keep off the grass: RF emissions!

2001-10-30 Thread Lothar Schmidt
. 411 Dixon Landing Road Milpitas, CA 95035 * +1 408 586 6214 * +1 408 586 6299 -Original Message- From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 8:39 AM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: Re: Keep off the grass: RF emissions! I read in !emc-pstc

Re: Keep off the grass: RF emissions!

2001-10-29 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Massimo Polignano wrote (in ) about 'Keep off the grass: RF emissions!', on Mon, 29 Oct 2001: >Is there any applicable product standard dealing with EMC and safety of >that kind of devices? In Europe, the Generic EMC Standards would apply plus whatever ETSI standards co

RE: Keep off the grass: RF emissions!

2001-10-29 Thread georgea
Alspaugh/Lex/Lexmark) Subject: RE: Keep off the grass: RF emissions! If it is an intentional radiator and operates above 9 kHz, it is considered to be a transmitter. If so, it is considered to be an inductive loop short range device in Europe and subject to EN 300330-1 and -2 for radio emissions

RE: Keep off the grass: RF emissions!

2001-10-29 Thread WOODS
If it is an intentional radiator and operates above 9 kHz, it is considered to be a transmitter. If so, it is considered to be an inductive loop short range device in Europe and subject to EN 300330-1 and -2 for radio emissions and EN 301489-1 and -3 for spurious emissions and immunity. FCC Part