, November 21, 2013 1:13 AM
Subject: RE: [PSES] EN 50581 part/range of parts
Piotr,
This topic illustrates a concept that can be called the supremacy of
practicality.
I agree with you that the RoHS directive calls for No . (unique
identification of the EEE): in the DoC. What I
In message D635B78C8DCB40A78C095A291F6BD905@MmPc24, dated Fri, 15 Nov
2013, Piotr Galka piotr.ga...@micromade.pl writes:
If I wouldn't know that it is stupidity I could think it is sabotage.
There is a similar epithet in London slang: 'It's not a carve-up, just a
cock-up.' (The latter
From: Piotr Galka
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 05:15
The fourth side: We (I hope I will not be alone) think
point 1 is an error - it should call for No... (unique
identification of document):
I will propose yet another position. This position appears to me to
logically suit the intent
.
Regards
Piotr Galka
- Original Message -
From: Peter Tarver ptar...@enphaseenergy.com
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 6:44 PM
Subject: Re: [PSES] EN 50581 part/range of parts
From: Piotr Galka
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 05:15
The fourth side: We (I
, November 19, 2013 10:02 AM
To: EMC-PSTC; Crane, Lauren
Subject: Re: [PSES] EN 50581 part/range of parts
Lauren and others,
I have read (I believe carefully) this FAQ.
From Q8.14 and Directive Article 7(g) I see that product identification can be
batch number. For my understanding it is not unique
-
From: Crane, Lauren
To: Piotr Galka ; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 2:22 AM
Subject: RE: [PSES] EN 50581 part/range of parts
Piotr,
Reading the EU Commission's FAQ on RoHS2 might help you
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/rohs_eee/pdf
Piotr,
Reading the EU Commission's FAQ on RoHS2 might help you
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/rohs_eee/pdf/faq.pdf.
Components (i.e. things not intended for direct sale to the end user) are not
considered to be in scope of RoHS (even though they fit the definition of EEE).
It has to do
7 matches
Mail list logo
