Steve,
Everything is negotiable but it sounds like a good approach.
61010-1 is designed for commercial electronic equipment and is adequate for
non-patient connected equipment in most respects. Do you need a single
certification (only CE or US or?) or will multiple
Thank to those who responded. I will offer options and recommendations to the
client and will guide their decision taking some of your guidance into
account.Stay healthy, stay safe.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Original message From: sgbrody Date:
5/21/20
WHICH “61010 vs 60601” – EU CE requirements OR US/Canadian (OR “somewhere
else”) requirements because they likely “differ in the details”?:)
John E Allen
W.London, UK
From: sgbrody
Sent: 21 May 2020 20:16
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] 61010 vs 60601
Fellow gurus,
If you mean “certified” as in it carries a 3rd party certification mark, then I
expect you’re looking at a full re-test
If you’re considering CE marking, then you may already have all the test data
that you need, but you should do a further assessment to check that the product
continues to
Fellow gurus,I have a client who has a product certified to 60601-1 and now
they have a non-medical application and are looking for 61010-1.Can the medical
cert and report be leveraged towards 61010-1 or a new report be started from
scratch?Same for EMC.Thanks,Sent from my Verizon, Samsung
Hi Steve:
I would think that 60601-1 certification is sufficient, and that 61010-1 is not
needed. After all, 60601-1 *should be* the more severe standard.
Some years ago, I certified a printer that was certified as EDP as medical
equipment too. Easy.
If you ask a
6 matches
Mail list logo
