Here is some additional information about INTI.
Internet http://www.inti.gov.ar http://www.inti.gov.ar
E-mail pr...@inti.gov.ar mailto:pr...@inti.gov.ar
The site is in Spanish; however, you can use the online translator at
http://babelfish.altavista.digital.com/
Richard
According to the EUR-LEX listing of the Directives and decisions, this
documnet was published in OJ L 050 of 20.02.97 p.28,
You can get copies of the OJ from various places including the UK
Stationary Office - or you could even try the Technical Help to Exporters
section of BSI.
I have used the EUDOR site to download TIFF image files of OJ's I want on
several occasions in recent months. These are scanned images of the
original journal pages so they have the full text including any tables and
figures.
If one so chooses (and has the software) the files can then be
For those in the USA, you can obtain directives by mail for free. Contact
European Community Information Services at 212 371-3804.
Richard Woods
--
From: Nick Williams [SMTP:n...@conformance.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 1999 6:16 AM
To: John
Must a member state transpose into national law a Commission Decision
pursuant to a Directive? For example, Decision 97/129/EC establishes the
identification system for packaging materials pursuant to Directive 94/62/EC
on packaging waste. Article 4 says This Decision is addressed to the Member
Ray,
The flippant answer is,-- it depends how conservative your company's
lawyers are and which partner is the heavy!
From the safety agency's perspective, it depends on the product standard and
on the agency, and even the individual evaluating engineer. It also
depends whether the product
For commercial aircraft usage, the current revision of RTCA/DO-160 would be
a natural place to start.
--
From: duncan.ho...@snellwilcox.com
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: EMC and Safety of equipment used in aircraft
Date: Wed, Nov 10, 1999, 7:14 AM
Group,
What safety
The current revision is RTCA/DO-160D, July 29, 1997. The phone number for
RTCA publications is 202-833-9339, or vrobe...@rtca.org.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Javor [SMTP:ken.ja...@emccompliance.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 1999 5:40 PM
To: duncan.ho...@snellwilcox.com;
Attached is a link to Eur-Lex which has a search for community legislation
in force in Europe. Not sure if this is valuable or not, but thought some of
you might want to be aware of it. I am IN NO WAY affiliated with this
company, just merely providing an interesting link.
I recommend you refer to the particular safety standard for your product,
which likely has a section dedicated to manual requirements.
-Original Message-
From: Russell, Ray ray_russ...@gastmfg.com
To: 'IEEE PSTC' emc-p...@ieee.org
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Wednesday,
Does anyone know if Puerto Rico requires anything different than the US for
telephone compliance?
Best Regards,
Jody Leber
jle...@ustech-lab.com
http://www.ustech-lab.com
U. S. Technologies
3505 Francis Circle
Alpharetta, GA 30004
770.740.0717
Fax: 770.740.1508
-
This message is
Greetings,
In this day and age of trying to cover your butt, from liability (especially
in the USA), I have found it interesting that the information in some User
manuals are going to the extreme to warn the consumer, while other similar
products have very few warnings.
In addition, our
I am looking for information on how to calculate the heating effects of
the sun on a metal enclosure (large power supply). I am afraid that I
have almost know knowledge in this area whatsoever.
Does anybody know of good resources that would help?
Regards,
Arjen Dragt
attachment: adragt.vcf
Take a look at Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics (RTCA) Document
No. DO-160B, Environmental Conditions and Test Procedures for Airborne
Equipment
The copy I have is dated July 20, 1984 Wow time flies!
The cover page is ISO 7137 if that's any help.
Basically, RTCA/DO-160 is
Dear Kevin,
I used to work in the alarm industry, and in fact sat on the CENELEC TC
developing EN50130-4 the EMC Immunity Standard For Components of Fire,
Intruder and Social Alarm Systems.
I believe your e mail may be referring to the product performance standards
such as EN 54 for Fire Alarm
Gateways.doc
Richard Woods
Gateways.doc
Description: MS-Word document
SalesAgents.doc
Richard Woods
SalesAgents.doc
Description: MS-Word document
This works for me:
http://europa.eu.int/comm/dg03/directs/dg3b/newapproa/eurstd/harmstds/index.
html
http://europa.eu.int/comm/dg03/directs/dg3b/newapproa/eurstd/harmstds/
Richard Woods
--
From: Ehler, Kyle [SMTP:kyle.eh...@lsil.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November
Something you may wish to consider. Some years ago the U.S.
army and navy both contracted for similar helicopters, but to
separate specs. The army version was the blackhawk, as I
recall.
The navy version was required to be far more immune to EMI,
as the navy was well aware of EMI problems due
Hi Kyle,
The URL you referenced is incomplete. There is an easier way. Just visit
the Safety Link
www.safetylink.com
Using your browser's Find tool -- search for the term Harmonized
Standards -- and you will be taken directly to this link. Click on it
and you're there (I just checked it
Group,
What safety and EMC standards would I have to consider for a piece of
equipment initially intended for use in a TV studio, but that is requested to be
able to be used in a helecopter or plane? I am also interested in what other
requirements and standards there may be for shock and
Does anyone know of an IEC 320 appliance inlet which
has as its output connector, viz. the termination
within the mechanical enclosure, a standard U.S. three
wire female receptacle?
Thanks for your help.
Regards,
George Alspaugh
Product Safety
Lexmark International Inc.
-
This
This link:
http://europa.eu.int/comm/dg03/directs/dg3b/newapproa/eurstd/harmstds/reflis
http://europa.eu.int/comm/dg03/directs/dg3b/newapproa/eurstd/harmstds/refli
s
Produces a '404' for me.
I get as far as http://europa.eu.int/comm/dg03/directs/dg3b/
Thanks to the 25 people who responded to my offer for a CD-ROM
with the 1996-1999 EMC Syposium Proceedings. Unfortunately, I
have only one copy.
Several of you asked where to buy a copy. You might try the IEEE
EMC Society web page, www.emcs.org, or Mira Digital Publishing,
phone +1
The recent notes on this topic piqued my interest. The results are
another testament to the power of the world-wide-web. I started with
an old favorite:
www.safetylink.com
Then under Safety Articles, FAQs, MRAs, etc. I found the following
listed website for Mexico's standards, maintained by
I do not remember commenting on Mexico's stadards, as I know little of
their standards or the cerrtification process. This is handled by our
local marketing there.
As I understand it, NOM is the certification agency, and NYCE is one of
the authorized testing companies.
It is my opinion that
I suspect that given the group's proclivity to talk endlessly on almost any
topic that the real reason that you got no response was that no one understood
your question sufficiently to answer it. You obviously have an alarm system.
You have some other EN standard which is in conflict with the
I understood that Mexico's standard was based upon the old UL 478. Has that
changed?
Richard Woods
--
From: John Allen [SMTP:john.al...@rdel.co.uk]
mailto:[SMTP:john.al...@rdel.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 1999 3:45 AM
To: 'wo...@sensormatic.com'
Subject: RE: ITE Standards
I can understand your frustration Kevin. Consider how standards come to be.
First the Commission gives a mandate to CENELEC to develop a standard in
support of the essential requirements of a particular directive. The
Commission monitors the development of the standard, so they have a strong
Group,
Thanks for your thoughts on this.
The main problem is not the power supply as this derives its power from the
backplane and so it is not powered up if removed. The main problem is the other
slots where the cumulative power from all of the redundant power supplies is
avaialable and this is
The European committee decided that implementation dates of new standards
could not be given away to the opinion of private organizations such as
IEC, ISO ETSI or CENELEC.
The implementation dates in the standard itself are therefore invalid
regarding to ce marking.
The real date limit is
I recommend you contact the Technical committee at Cenelec responsible for
authoring the standard to ascertain the reason for the clauses. They may
shed some light on what you consider to be inconsistencies in the
regulations.
Rich Lanzillotto
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Harris
Kevin,
I cannot believe that we are all cowards here. However, it may be that we
are unfamiliar with your subject matter. I, for one, have never heard of
the EMC standard EN50130-4, don't know if it falls under the new approach
EMC Directive or not, and don't know what other EN standards it
33 matches
Mail list logo
