Does somebody own the NEMA ratings or is it a bit like the CE mark. Test to
the appropriate standards and claim you are NEMA class whatever? How about the
European IP ratings - owned (meaning you have to submit to some specific
organization) or attested to through testing.
Thanks
Hi Jacob,
I'll get back to you on 31 FEB '04 on that subject.
Best regards, Art Michael
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* International Product Safety Bookshop *
* Check out our current offerings! *
*
The IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society has an interesting clause in their
By-Laws regarding the payment of dues:
8.1 Society annual assessment of fees
The annual Society fee shall be determined by action of the Board of
Directors. Failure of a Society member to pay the
Derek,
This points out one of the weaknesses of the self-declaration (DOC). The
responsible party can self declare for whatever standards they feel suite
their needs. For instance, just because a product is CE marked, it doesn't
mean that it has been tested or passed to all the relevant standards.
Hello everyone,
Would anyone happen to know if there are any fire and evac regualroty
requirments for passive speaker in Japan? I have checked on the METI website
and was not able to find any information. I also called JETRO who pointed me
to METI
For the U.S we are certified to UL1480 and
From reading the extracts in the e-mail below I would rather conclude that
an audio amp would be an incidental radiator. I am not sure what this
implies but in all of my audiophile life, I have never seen a purely analog
amp with an FCC label... Before spending any money on testing, I guess it
Hi all
Funny to see how questions which seems to too simple, can turn out to be
difficult. I have been into to the same problem before.
I think we need to look at the FCC text it self.
The definition in 47 FCC Part 15 Subpart A says:
15.3 (z) Unintentional radiator. A device that
7 matches
Mail list logo
