Dear Ron,
Apart from CCC, the CVC (China Voluntary
Certification) covers 28 categories of equipment and
those are very possible to become the 2nd catalogue of
CCC products but uncertain yet.
As you may know there are already some cross overlap
between CCC mark and MII (NAL) for TTE, i.e. some
ter
Dear Chris,
Your vendor probably used a wrong agent.
In deed, Maylaysia telecom approval is complicated
because it has not only telecom approval but also need
importatnt permit (JK69)under local
representative/dealer's name from SQAS even for the
test samples (maximum two test samples are require
Sorry - Portland Oregon.
Jim
From: Camille Good [mailto:goodca_ve...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 4:07 PM
To: Jim Eichner; EMC-PSTC - Forum
Subject: Re: EMC consultant in Portland area?
Do you mean Portland, Oregon? There is also a
Portland, Maine . . . .
-Camille
Portland, O
Do you mean Portland, Oregon? There is also a
Portland, Maine . . . .
-Camille
Portland, Oregon
--- Jim Eichner wrote:
> Request from an associate of mine at a different
> company, who is having
> some emissions problems with a piece of industrial
> equipment. He's
> looking for someone to he
Request from an associate of mine at a different company, who is having
some emissions problems with a piece of industrial equipment. He's
looking for someone to help diagnose and fix (or filter/shield) an
emissions problem as a contract job. Anybody interested please send me
your details off-lin
"customer wants to use "hot surface" when it does not pose a risk of burns"
Couple of questions to consider.
Is a burn the only type of injury/harm associated with a warm/hot surface?
Have there been any similar cases in Product Liability Case law.
However since the label requirement is not statu
Hi Richard,
The process will depend on the equipment at hand. For equipment with the more
"traditional" interfaces - i.e. analog, ISDN, etc - in-country testing is
required, either at the SIRIM lab or at the carrier (Telekom Malaysia) lab
(depending on the type of equipment involved). Equipment i
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
While the discussion of overused warning keywords is ancillary to this one, my
main concern is that a customer wants to use "hot surface" when it does not
pose a risk of burns. The user may then ignore that warning and mentally
conclude that warnings o
Malaysia is in-country testing.
Telecom tests are similar to JATE.
What telecom interface is your product?
We use a vendor to get our Malaysia approvals and it cost us more than any
other Pacrim country.
Christopher
"Stone, Richard" wrote:
good morning group,
has anyone tried to sumbit an app
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
Chris,
All these considerations were taken into account. This is a 40 ºC product
and several operating conditions were tested in the high ambient. The worst
case is the 50 ºC surface temperature measurement.
Thanks, -doug
_
From: Ja
Pete Perkins, a local product safety consultant here
in Portland, Oregon, had a presentation about safety
markings that included discussion about the usage of
"Caution", "Warning" and "Danger".
It's been a couple of years since I've seen his
presentation and the discussion mainly applied to the
us
Need your help,
Looking for the graphical symbols for RS232. (three (3) different type of
symbols for RS232)
1> <-> with diamond
2> IOIOI
__
3>_I I_I I_
Which one?
Thanks
Joshua Kim
Senior Regulatory Engineer
Welch Allyn
4341 State Street Road
P.O. Box 220
Skaneateles Falls, NY
1
Under what ambient conditions do they reach 50C? in an ambient of 20C ??
What temp do they reach in an ambient of 30C?
What is the max op temp for the equipment?
…
Regards,
Chris
_
From: owner-emc-p...@listserv.ieee.org
mailto:owner-emc-p...@listserv.ieee.org] O
Doug -
While I don't have an answer for you, but I do have a
similar concern where signal words like "caution,"
"warning," and "danger" are overused and the hazard
overstated.
I'm also concerned about ESD concerns plunked under a
heading of "safety" in manuals.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
pt
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
All,
Does anyone know if there are any standards-based rules about superfluous
labeling of products?
I have heard that some countries have rules about proliferation of labels as
they can have the effect of masking the real hazards. In this in
Ken -
With the advent of leakage current meters, like the Simpson
228 and 229-2, it would be interesting to know what one of
those meters (in particular the 229-2) indicate the current
flow is, just as a cross check.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
ptar...@ieee.org
This message is from the IEEE
Tom -
FWIW, the link provided below leads to the self-same file as
the bottom link on the URL provided by John. And it's no
longer at the bottom of the page, it's the first bulleted
list item on the page.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
ptar...@ieee.org
From: Tom Cokenias
Sent: Saturday, Decem
good morning group,
has anyone tried to sumbit an application to ship into Malaysia thru Sirim QAS,
for telecommuncations equipment? I'd like to know the process, I searched a
few sites
and came up empty. From what I have found, you need to apply with Sirim QAS,
and pay a fee
and also pay for labe
Pierre Bonjour,
The US equivalent may be any of the following depending on the product and
application.
1) UL 1431, "Personal Hygiene and Health Care Appliances"
2) UL 1028, "Electric Hair Clipping and Shaving Appliances"
3) UL 859, "Electric Personal Grooming Appliances"
Also UL 1097, "Doubl
19 matches
Mail list logo
