- The customer could also view the situation as the standards body
performing due diligence, and making corrections to the standard when they
discover issues. Performing standards maintenance helps protect the
customer in case of user lawsuits.
- I wonder if there's an 'errors and omissions'
Hi Brian:
... they want to see complete list of organizations
and individuals that contributed to the errors that
caused a mandatory update to the standard.
Errors is an assumption made by the customer lawyers.
I would disagree that the mandatory updates were due to
errors.
Seldom do published
FWIW, the legal dorks seem to be backing off. Probably because they did not see
a big pay day.
Agree, in part, with Mr. Woodgate that the industry 'gets what they deserve'.
But we have previously discussed the limits of corporate and individual
participation in the standards development
In message
e2bb98c9e17843a6ad8d5d1d6159b...@blupr02mb116.namprd02.prod.outlook.com
, dated Sat, 9 Nov 2013, Brian Oconnell oconne...@tamuracorp.com
writes:
The other reason will never serve on a committee is that I am not an
expert on any single subject area,
That's NOT a disadvantage, at
4 matches
Mail list logo
