Re: [PSES] Equipment rack for GR1089 testing - does it have to be metal?

Hello Neven, Perhaps this is not what you were looking for but: >From GR-1089 issue 06 page 70, (3.5.5.3.4), The EUT should be grounded in a manner consistent with typical installation of the equipment as described in Section 9.3. I do not know if the metal rack will be a worst case scenario,

Re: [PSES] EN 50581 part/range of parts

Peter, I think all your 3 levels should be considered under point 4 of DoC content (RoHS2 Annex VI) according to manufacturer needs. The problem I am speaking about is point 1 of this content, which I suppose should not be about product identification but about DoC unique identification. Reg

[PSES] Job openings for Product Safety/EMC Engineers and Technicians in US and Taiwan

I have trimmed all the fluff out of the official posting, to help you cut to the chase. At the bottom of this email are links and job codes for each posting. To learn more about Garmin’s unique market position and what drives us to win, check out this short video

Re: [PSES] EN 50581 part/range of parts

> From: Piotr Galka > Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 05:15 > > The fourth side: We (I hope I will not be alone) think > point 1 is an error - it should call for "No... (unique > identification of document):" I will propose yet another position. This position appears to me to logically suit the i

Re: [PSES] EN 50581 part/range of parts

In message , dated Fri, 15 Nov 2013, Piotr Galka writes: "If I wouldn't know that it is stupidity I could think it is sabotage. There is a similar epithet in London slang: 'It's not a carve-up, just a cock-up.' (The latter refers to fitting an arrow to a bow upside down, so the 'cock' feat

Re: [PSES] EN 50581 part/range of parts

Lauren, After a week of trying to find how the need for "unique identification of EEE" should be in practice realised I have completely new idea. Annex VI of ROHS2 looks like a recipe what point after point should be in DoC. Why identification of device is mentioned two times - in 1. and 4. ? Pu