Re: [PSES] Korea KN 32

2017-01-31 Thread itl-emc user group
My experience is also 10m measurements. They also want spectral plots of the measurements even if performed on an OATS where background noise can also appear in the plot. KN32 and KN35 are not available in English. You can try translating a little bit at a time with google translate to compare

Re: [PSES] CISPR 16 Compliant EMI Receivers up to 40 GHz

2017-01-31 Thread Balmukund Vyas
Keysight receivers are also CISPR compliant. From: Grace Lin [mailto:graceli...@gmail.com] Sent: 01 February 2017 04:03 To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] CISPR 16 Compliant EMI Receivers up to 40 GHz Dear Members, When talking about CISPR 16 compliant EMI receivers, we know the

Re: [PSES] Do it yourself safety reports?

2017-01-31 Thread Brian O'Connell
Practical for you and me? Yes. Practical for someone that has to ask? Perhaps, but probably not. One should be on intimate terms with the TRF, understand the meaning of declarations per RED, RoHS, etc, and be willing to compile and defend a Technical Construction File. Brian From: Curtis

[PSES] Do it yourself safety reports?

2017-01-31 Thread Curtis McNamara
A client is asking if it is practical to do their own 60950 safety reports for CE. The device is battery powered, low power RF (they would have complete EMC testing done at a lab). Thanks in advance for your suggestions. Thanks for all the great past advice! Curt -

Re: [PSES] add 60950 to a new supplier's product which only has FCC?

2017-01-31 Thread Jim Bacher
Adam, depends on how well you want company A hidden from company B's customers. As Rich commented on safety I will comment on FCC. On the FCC depends on whether there is a transmitter involved as to what path can be used and how to address. If there is no transmitter, you can just issue a

[PSES] CISPR 16 Compliant EMI Receivers up to 40 GHz

2017-01-31 Thread Grace Lin
Dear Members, When talking about CISPR 16 compliant EMI receivers, we know the ones from R are good. Is there any other brands/models on the market that have the same performance? Thank you very much for your time and we look forward to hearing from you. Best regards, Grace Lin -

Re: [PSES] Korea KN 32

2017-01-31 Thread Schmidt, Mark
Hello Dieter, My experience with Korea is that they only accept 10 meter measurements even for KN 32. Not sure where you can get a Korean Standard in English. I doubt if they are available unless you have it translated of course. Regards, Mark Schmidt From: Paasche, Dieter

Re: [PSES] Korea KN 32

2017-01-31 Thread Julian Jones
In our experience no. It's 10m only. Julian Jones Hursley EMC On 31 Jan 2017, at 21:09, Vincent Lee <08e6c8d35910-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org> wrote: South Korea KN standards are in Korean language. The English translation is not of much use

Re: [PSES] Korea KN 32

2017-01-31 Thread Vincent Lee
South Korea KN standards are in Korean language.  The English translation is not of much use during dispute. It is the Korean one that prevail. Regards, Vincent From: "Paasche, Dieter" To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017

[PSES] Korea KN 32

2017-01-31 Thread Paasche, Dieter
Hi group, CISPR 32 allows class A products to be tested at 3m. Would KN 32 accept it as well? I appreciate it If anybody can let me know where I can get a copy of KN 32 in English. Thanks. Sincerely, Dieter Paasche Advanced Product Developer, Electrical CHRISTIE 809 Wellington Street North

[PSES] Expert on regulatory requirements wanted

2017-01-31 Thread John Woodgate
A US-based colleague is looking for an expert to advise on regulatory requirements for electrical safety and, if possible, fire for countries other than Europe and North America. If you can help, I will pass your email address to him. With best wishes DESIGN IT IN! OOO - Own Opinions Only