Re: [PSES] short range device alternate suppliers and labeling

2017-11-14 Thread Peter Tarver
My thanks to all for their input. I chanced on some interesting reading yesterday in Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 211 / Thursday, November 2, 2017 / Rules and Regulations. In this document, there are some exceptions to physical labeling where an electronic display of the required

Re: [PSES] Safety Link - has changed

2017-11-14 Thread Dan Roman
Hi Doug, Art Michael sold that URL off a while back. I do not think it is back up permanently but an old copy can be found here: http://shelltown.net/~amichael/ Art is not on this list but maybe someone has his contact info? I thought I did but cannot find it at the moment.

Re: [PSES] Safety Link - has changed

2017-11-14 Thread Pete Perkins
Doug, et al, Art Michaels, who ran Safetylink for so many years has retired. I used it, too and had a paper archived there which I routinely directed folks to. He was working at moving the content to a new site which,

Re: [PSES] Safety Link - has changed

2017-11-14 Thread Doug Powell
Thanks Dan, The link looks good although I'm guessing Art will not maintain links as carefully as before. Of course I could be wrong about that. It's very nice having an information clearing house like this. Best, Doug On Nov 14, 2017 6:48 PM, "Dan Roman" wrote: > Hi

[PSES] Safety Link - has changed

2017-11-14 Thread Doug Powell
All, For a number of years I have used a website that now seems to be retired and recycled. Safety Link was great resource and is now a company working in Fall Protection. You can see the changes at archive.org - Old: ​

Re: [PSES] Regulatory requirements for MOVs placed line-to-ground on AC mains ports?

2017-11-14 Thread Richard Nute
Hi Joe: You said: " Unfortunately, Annex Q does not help to define the term "adequate breaking capacity" as called for in clause 1.5.9.2 for fuses required in series with the MOV." The term "adequate breaking capacity" means the authors (committee) did not know how to determine the

Re: [PSES] Clicks per CISPR 14-1

2017-11-14 Thread Ralph McDiarmid
Indeed, why not merely add a Peak limit or perhaps better, an Average limit? Doing that would avoid an effort to clarify the issue with words. Avg & QP limits have served well in CISPR11 and in CISPR22 for a long time. Ralph McDiarmid Product Compliance Engineering Solar Business Schneider