[PSES] Differences between IEC 60533 2nd and 3rd Edition

2018-01-25 Thread Michael Violette
Hi Folks, Can anyone please share if there were substantial limits/test level changes between 2nd and 3rd editions of IEC 60533? Thanks, Mike Michael Violette, P.E. Director American Certification Body mi...@wll.com +1 240-401-1388 -

Re: [PSES] IATA/ICAO and U 83.3 rules

2018-01-25 Thread Brian O'Connell
1. IATA packing instructions 967 and 970. 2. UN category 3481 (may be other effective cats). 3. individual carrier regulations. Brian From: Doug Powell [mailto:doug...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 12:45 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] IATA/ICAO and U 83.3 rules

Re: [PSES] IATA/ICAO and U 83.3 rules

2018-01-25 Thread Scott Aldous
Hi Doug, IATA has information that will help also. The 2017 lithium battery guidance doc can be found here . This is not the latest version as of Jan. 1st, however. You can find some relevant up to

Re: [PSES] IATA/ICAO and U 83.3 rules

2018-01-25 Thread Ted Eckert
Hello Doug, Go to the following website and download the “Shipping lithium batteries – documentation requirements” file. http://www.fedex.com/id/tools/lithium.html It has a flow chart showing the UN shipping requirements for batteries packaged within products. The batteries will need UN 38.3

Re: [PSES] IATA/ICAO and U 83.3 rules

2018-01-25 Thread IBM Ken
Hi Doug; I believe UN 83.3 is a test specification and doesn't prescribe rules about shipment. I assume the airlines don't really care about inadvertent activation (assuming the heat generated will be reasonably low and no active cooling is required) but they would just insist that the

[PSES] IATA/ICAO and U 83.3 rules

2018-01-25 Thread Doug Powell
Hi all, I am curious to know if anyone is familiar with IATA/ICAO and UN 83.3 rules as they apply to shipment of cell phones (and other products) with built in batteries. Many manufacturers generally separate the battery from the product or insulate one of the terminals to prevent inadvertent

Re: [PSES] EN60825-1 Date of Withdrawal

2018-01-25 Thread John Woodgate
As far as I can see, these delayed updates may be made at any time, with no notice, so it would be prudent to assume that it will happen next week, and consider the consequences. John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk Rayleigh, Essex UK On 2018-01-25

Re: [PSES] EN60825-1 Date of Withdrawal

2018-01-25 Thread JIM WIESE
While we are at it, does anyone have an update or know when the OJ will be updated to reflect the new date for withdrawal of 60950-1, that was approved by Cenelec early last year Thanks, Jim Wiese Senior Compliance Engineer Office: 256.963.8431 Mobile: 256.714.5882 Email: jim.wi...@adtran.com