[PSES] Fwd: Permanent / Direct Hire Opportunity for Product Safety Engineers

2018-11-12 Thread Scott Douglas
Forwarded to the list at the request of the sender. Please reply directly to the originator and not to me. Scott Forwarded Message Subject:Permanent / Direct Hire Opportunity for Product Safety Engineers Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 16:17:54 + From: Arvi Abellana

Re: [PSES] This is a Test - This is Only a Test - Second Attempt

2018-11-12 Thread Matthew Wilson
BASE64 encoding on attachments used by email clients would mean approximately 37% increase in file size on the email. So with an imposed 10 megabyte limit then the largest single file-size image you could attach and send successfully would be around 7 megabytes or so. Test image was received

Re: [PSES] Fully anechoic chamber vs. Semi-anechoic chamber

2018-11-12 Thread John Woodgate
It would be helpful, especially if it discloses unexpected deviations, but the cable layouts of different EUTs have a significant influence, so might well show different transfer functions.  Data collected from such dual measurements could be helpful to CISPR/A. John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions

Re: [PSES] Fully anechoic chamber vs. Semi-anechoic chamber

2018-11-12 Thread Manny Barron
Hi Amund, This approach can get tricky. There are several factors that will influence the results in either chamber and in general are not easily predictable. If I were doing this I would implement a required minimum 10 dB margin when testing in the FAC. But that's just me, I'm typically

Re: [PSES] Fully anechoic chamber vs. Semi-anechoic chamber

2018-11-12 Thread James Pawson (U3C)
Hi Amund, One place to start is looking at the difference in limits in EN 55032 for a SAC and for a FAR (see attached graph). Above 230MHz the chart is 5dB lower to account for the lack of a reflective ground plane. I don't know how the upward-sloping compensation below 230MHz was derived