On Fri, 2 Oct 2020 21:34:17 +,
MARIO DE ARANZETA wrote:
> I've read information on several websites about extremely low power devices
> for Japan. The fundamental limit being 500uV/m@3m for frequencies below 322
> MHz. Does anyone know if this is a Q-P or Average.Also what is the limit
I've read information on several websites about extremely low power devices for
Japan. The fundamental limit being 500uV/m@3m for frequencies below 322 MHz.
Does anyone know if this is a Q-P or Average.Also what is the limit for
harmonics?
Thanks to all in advance,Mario de Aranzeta
-
Hi Brian:
Be careful that the customers’ requests are not just asking by rote.
Way back when, we had customers asking about UV emissions from a crt. Most
glass is a good attenuator of UV, but the asking (non-technical) customers were
asking because someone in their company asked th
Thanks for the correction. Haven’t used the standard in a few years.
Josh
Joshua Wiseman
Systems Engineering
Staff Engineer, Product Safety/EMC
Ortho Clinical Diagnostics
[cid:image001.png@01D698BC.81B0A780]
From: Dan Roman <0d75e04ed751-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ieee.org>
Sent: Friday, Octobe
I believe that Clause 4.1 of EN 62479:2010 specifically states route A can be
considers as inherently compliant for ITE that do not contain radio
transmitters.
From Ken Shadoff
> On Oct 2, 2020, at 9:56 AM, Dan Roman
> <0d75e04ed751-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ieee.org> wrote:
>
>
> So a Cla
EN 62233 is called out in the EN version of 60335-1, but not in the IEC
version. So it is an EU deviation only I believe.
Dan
From: Wiseman, Joshua [mailto:joshua.wise...@orthoclinicaldiagnostics.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2020 3:19 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [P
So a Class B emissions report, provided the product is not an intentional
radiator I guess, would be enough for due diligence to show compliance. Put a
note to that effect referencing the Class B report and it appears to me you
should be good to go.
Dan
From: Charlie Blackham [mailto:ch
7 matches
Mail list logo
