Thanks guys.
I checked out the actual case yesterday and was told that the reason for
observing QP for a longer time was that the product had used a spread
spectrum technique.
Best regards Amund
Fra: Paasche, Dieter
Sendt: 6. desember 2021 16:35
Til:
Hi,
I agree with the statements mentioned. It depends on the nature of the
disturbance and you would have to find out what is happening during that period
of time. I would also suggest to review CISPR 16-2-1, specifically to the
definition of continuous disturbance.
Section 3 continuous
Perhaps you should contact a Notified Body?
On Sun, Dec 5, 2021 at 5:36 PM Pete Perkins <
0061f3f32d0c-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ieee.org> wrote:
> This message originated outside of DISH and was sent by:
> owner-emc-p...@listserv.ieee.org
>
> All, I have a client that is producing a
Interesting topic!
Completely agree with Brent!.
I would only add the "quality" of the signal can also contribute to the
variation - by that I mean if there
is any kind of modulation on the signal then that will contribute to the
measurement difficulties.
It is also not unusual for a lab to
Dear Pate,
In sub-chapter 1.6 of my recent published second volume “Electrical Product
Compliance and Safety Engineering” you will find useful references for the
applicable standards and EU Directives for the subject product. About RoHS you
can refer to sub chapter 3.3. If you do not have
5 matches
Mail list logo