I'd posted a week or two back about residential EV chargers.Here's the current 
theory: My company sells a that's residential energy monitoring system (V2) 
certified to 61010, an and EV charger certified to UL 2564.  Customers assert 
that extra market can be obtained by combined deployment of the two as an 
Energy Management System (EMS), per NFPA 625.42.  This avoids having to upgrade 
panels that are only 100A when installing a level 2 charger.  Now jump to 
NFPA's definition of an EMS from 750.6"Listed individual components assembled 
as a system." My theory is that a V2 listed to 61010 installed with a charger 
listed to 2594 could be employed as an EMS without the need for additional 
certifications, or haggling over which standard would best apply. We may 
eventually pursue UL 916 certification in the future, but I think we don't need 
to at present. Thoughts ideas and input welcome;  anybody know any inspectors 
who've had questions about EV chargers? Colorado Brian 
720-450-4933

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<emc-p...@ieee.org>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <j.bac...@ieee.org>
David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
_________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link: 
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC&A=1

Reply via email to