Hi John
We do have a Kalmus that we use and also have the manuals for it.
Will look Monday and see if I can get the pinouts.
Which connector number is the one you are talking about and model number
of the amp?
Regards,
Mac
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of
Hello colleagues,
Does anyone know the general changes in the update to CISPR 22 released in
version 6 that was just circulated as a draft?
May consider purchasing it if changes are significant, but would rather wait
until it is published if possible.
Regards,
Mac Elliott
- -
Hello Colleagues
After rain on an OATS, what are your typical guidelines for the resumption of
test?
I worked with one great engineer on this board at one time who had seen
dramatic differences on his OATS after rain and would shut down until the next
day when the site was dry.
We are tryin
This may be a good lead in to a question that I had regarding that amendment.
I haven't had the opportunity [or need] to really compare directly, but at
first glance it seemed that the Amendment 1 to 61000-4-3:2006 may be similar
to Annex D in IEEE 1309.
Does anyone know if this is the case or i
Does anyone out there know of a good source to rent / lease or buy a used one
of these?
Best regards,
William "Mac" Elliott
EMC Engineer
8000 West Sunrise Blvd
Plantation, Florida 33322-9947
Phone: 954.723.5480
Email: fme...@motorola.com
[ X ] General Public
- --
A colleague has told me that they have found EM Test to be very user friendly.
I have had good experience with California Instruments equipment in the past as
well.
Not sure how either compares to the Agilent System mentioned though
Best regards,
Mac Elliott
[ X ] General Public
From
Does anyone know the current status of the release of the latest revision of
ANSI C63.4?
It was still in comment phase during the Symposium in Detroit but was expected
to publish this year I believe.
Best regards,
Mac Elliott
[] Motorola Confidential Restricted (MCR),
[ X ] Motorola
Which brings up a point just to add for accredited labs that do this
in-house. I agree that it is a characterization and not a calibration,
My understanding is that if you do this in house you may have make sure
that you meet the Accreditation Body Traceability requirements as an
in-house calibra
All
Our cal guys are telling me that they are having a hard time finding a
lab that can do 17025 accredited calibrations for our Davis Weather
Monitor that we use on our OATS to measure temp / humidity / and
barometric pressure during our testing.
Any suggestions?
Best regards,
Ma
Season's Greetings to all
I agree with this - have had success with it in the past.
Minimizes effect to RI setup as well of moving absorbers in and out.
Leave as calibrated.
I did a correlation study with a reference radiator to develop the
correlation factor to the OATS
Best r
Hi Ken
We are close to Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Best regards,
Mac Elliott
[] General Public
-Original Message-
From: IBM Ken [mailto:ibm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 10:32 AM
To: Elliott Mac-FME001
Cc: EMC-PSTC@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: Lab Needed for
11 11:16 AM
To: Elliott Mac-FME001
Cc: EMC-PSTC@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: Lab Needed for 17025 Accredited Calibration for Davis
Weather Station
Ahh; if you were in the Northeast I had a couple of suggestions. The
only place I've dealt with getting ISO 17025 accredited calibration in
the RH sensor can be verified using the
> chemical kits or calc using dry/wet bulb readings.
>
> Do not have a weather station at place of employment, but have several
> similar sensors connected to data logger to monitor lab conditions during
> all tests, and have never had any problem sub
Hello Group
I got a question from a lab thinking about performing dual antenna mast testing
for radiated emissions in a 3m semi-anechoic chamber.
I have questions about doing this due to antenna coupling, especially below 1
GHz, and also whether or not this configuration would pass CISPR SVSWR
Hello
Does anyone out there [if any equipment reps on list] have an OPHIR 5127F
amplifier for 12 month lease or rental?
We used a similar one for years and suited our immunity test setup very well.
Calibration fields were easily repeated prior to testing. Very stable amp.
The one we have now s
Sad news
Best regards,
Mac Elliott
[] General Public
-Original Message-
From: vm...@ieee.org [mailto:vm...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Donald Sweeney
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 9:27 AM
To: vm...@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: FW: Ed Bronaugh
I will follow up when I know mo
Elliott Mac-FME001 would like to recall the message, "Ed Bronaugh".
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
Al
Thanks, Lauren.
Does anyone know what the proposed Interoperability requirements being proposed
are?
Best regards,
Mac Elliott
[] General Public
From: Crane, Lauren [mailto:lauren.cr...@kla-tencor.com]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 1:35 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] R
Hello group,
A colleague of mine mentioned that he had seen a "stand-alone" EMI chamber at a
test lab. One of the obstacles we have in getting a chamber is the lack of
space in our building and he thought this may be a good solution to our dilemma.
I am not aware of any chambers that do not req
your turntable, power cables, etc. That way you
can roll large or heavy equipment into the chamber without using an elevator or
have to go up steps. Just my 2 cents.
The Other Brian
From: emc-p...@ieee.org<mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org> [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On
Behalf Of Elliott Mac-FME001
S
20 matches
Mail list logo
