We are testing 2 coil windings (at a same time) for resistance using 4 wires
Kelvin connection. Acceptable (Pass) Value ranges for the parts are: Part A
2.3 - 2.7 Ohm Part B 5.4 - 5.8 Ohms. We want to know if the part is within
(good) these ranges or out (bad) of these ranges. We should be
Forwarding Test Equipment Reply for all who may need a source:
David Gaffney states
Dear Al,
Thanks for forwarding the inquiry for Product Safety Test Equipment. Our
manufacturing calibration of this specialized equipment can save
manufacturers an enormous amount of resources/time (vs.
Most esteemed colleagues, we are looking for your professional opinion on a
UL 544 leakage limit (I think you will find this interesting):
1. This particular product uses a UL 544 evaluated direct plug in power
supply with outputs to the patient care equipment. In this case it is a
diagnostic
I have a quick question. We are in the process of getting a draft copy of the
6th edition IEC 65. Our engineers are out and someone asked about the new
Leakage Current circuit.
Anyone having a quick reply (i.e. same as IEC 950, etc.) I would certainly
appreciate it.
Thanks in advance
Your assistance if greatly appreciated (even if you can only answer some of
the questions):
I have a general question concerning the applicable Directive for equipment
originally classified as ITE here in the US (by an International Lab with NRTL
accreditation).
(not a Telecom expert) The
Your assistance if greatly appreciated (even if you can only answer some of
the questions):
I have a general question concerning the applicable Directive for equipment
originally classified as ITE here in the US (by an International Lab with NRTL
accreditation).
(not a Telecom expert) The
please someone make this person stop they have sent over 100 of these in
the last few days
In a message dated 11/22/99 12:02:37 PM Eastern Standard Time,
george.da...@unisys.com writes:
emc-p...@ieee.org (EMC PSTC)
I understood the purpose of this forum is not to monitor the e-mails so that
you can reference persons to your services. Please respond and take action as
needed.
Ed
In a message dated 7/30/99 5:55:14 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
a...@safety.demon.co.uk writes:
emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Many of the members and professional services participating in this group
resist this type of advertisement.
---BeginMessage---
Hi Darrell members.
Authorised
Reposting without attachment. Sorry group I'll get the hang of it. For those
who have provided response to date, thanks much
I wrote - We are working some responses to OSHA and would like to ask for some
industry response from the Product Safety group (EMC welcome to respond too).
Just
STEPHEN J. RAY JR.
8228 Brian Court
Garner, N. C. 27529
(919) 553-0783
QUALIFICATIONS SUMMARY
Engineering Project Handling, Laboratory Testing/Procedure, Telecommunications,
Systems Planning and Operations and Transmission/Distribution Voltage Systems;
four years in the U.S. Navy; five years
Hello Again Group,
There are several documents available from OSHA's site. Attached is another pdf
from OSHA dated 1993 to show more history of OSHA requirements/laws...
This letter defines the term approved which is used in several 29CRF
documents and also used in the NEC. Again, OSHA
We are working some responses to OSHA and would like to ask for some industry
response from the Product Safety group (EMC welcome to respond too).
Just looking for a quick statement on the Value of using a Non-NRTL firm for
testing and/or certification (Listing).
Statement: Non-NRTL
13 matches
Mail list logo
