RE: Constant for Change of Resistance formula.

the formula is applied (motors, relay coils, transformers, solenoids and other mechelec devices), the resistance is high enough to get a good result as long as you follow the guidelines (like those above). Thanks for raising the measurement factors. Bill Ellingford -Original Message- From

RE: Constant for Change of Resistance formula.

at 20c then 234.5 + 20 is the multiplier. -Original Message- From: Robert Macy [mailto:m...@california.com] Sent: 13 May 2002 14:54 To: Bill Ellingford; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: Re: Constant for Change of Resistance formula. Bill, Thanks for the site. Went there and found

RE: Constant for Change of Resistance formula.

coefficient methods and transposition of the measurement of change of junction voltage formulae i.e. Thermocouple laws. Hope this adds some value: Bill Ellingford -Original Message- From: Colgan, Chris [mailto:chris.col...@tagmclaren.com] Sent: 13 May 2002 10:28 To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org

RE: RTTE Directive

(but not bed time) reading for this subject! the 99/5/EC directive can be downloaded from our favourite EUROPA server. Hope this helps. Best regards Bill Ellingford Approvals Conformance manager Motion Media Technology Ltd -Original Message- From: j...@aol.com [mailto:j...@aol.com] Sent

Employment

preference to stay in the Glos / Bristol / Newport region. I would be very pleased to hear from anyone within the group with news on any possible openings / positions in this area. Bill Ellingford Approvals / Conformance Manager, Motion Media Technology Ltd company E-mail address valid until 17 May 02

RE: A very nice game

URGENT Please be aware that the above E-mail to the EMC group contained a virus. Fortunately our system removed it from the message. Bill Ellingford -Original Message- From: jmw [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk] Sent: 24 April 2002 22:59 To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: A very nice game

RE: product modifications by the end user

still be some EMC issues to address but safety compliance is not impossible! Bill Ellingford -Original Message- From: geor...@lexmark.com [mailto:geor...@lexmark.com] Sent: 19 March 2002 14:26 To: Colgan, Chris Cc: 'Emc-Pstc' (E-mail) Subject: Re: product modifications by the end user

RE: CE Mark on Product Packaging

(now EU). This does differ from the RTTE requirement and is the basis for the differing needs to CE mark packaging. I am of course interested in other views on this interpretation. Bill Ellingford -Original Message- From: Scott Lemon [mailto:sle...@caspiannetworks.com] Sent: 15 March

RE: Voltage Spikes on Power Lines etc

high voltage spikes and lightning induced voltages etc. Bill Ellingford -Original Message- From: George Stults [mailto:george.stu...@watchguard.com] Sent: 14 March 2002 17:17 To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: Voltage Spikes on Power Lines etc Hi Folks, I am trying right now

RE: CE Mark on Product Packaging

, it is the person placing product on the market who carries legal liability. This means that goods can be imported into the EU with the CE declaration so marking the packaging resolves customs issues in these circumstances. Bill Ellingford -Original Message- From: Russell [mailto:r

RE: RTTE and video out

Guide? Bill Ellingford -Original Message- From: Kim Boll Jensen [mailto:kimb...@post7.tele.dk] Sent: 13 March 2002 10:49 To: EMC-PSTC; treg Subject: RTTE and video out Hi all I have an equipment which can convert audio and video (phono connector) signal from a PC to a normal HF antenna

RE: ventilation holes

by not requesting the answers??? Bill Ellingford -Original Message- From: Gregg Kervill [mailto:gkerv...@pgtv.net] Sent: 27 February 2002 02:06 To: 'George Stults'; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: ventilation holes Please have a look at http://www.test4safety.com/html/elearning.htm

RE: Different shades of UL

mark but requires installation instructions as part of the assessment. Hope this helps: Bill Ellingford Approvals and Compliance manager Motion Media Technology -Original Message- From: Chris Maxwell [mailto:chris.maxw...@nettest.com] Sent: 22 February 2002 14:40 To: EMC-PSTC Internet

RE: Packaging vs. Shipping Container

. The scope I believe to be accurate but I welcome others to join in on this one. Bill Ellingford. Approvals Manager Motion Media Technology Ltd -- From: colin_mcgeec...@hp-unitedkingdom-om4.om.hp.com[SMTP:colin_mcgeec...@hp-unitedkingdom-om4.om.hp.com] Sent: 23 June 1999 15:16

RE: E M terminology . . . .

not the correct ones. Bill Ellingford -- From: Barry C. Quinlan[SMTP:bsi_little...@csi.com] Sent: 16 June 1999 19:23 To: t...@world.std.com Subject:Re: E M terminology . . . . The definition in the 15th Edition of Newton's Telecom Dictionary is: Ear Mouth Earth and Magneto