, and surface
area of contact. Lots of interesting equations.
Jim Hulbert
From: Douglas Powell
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2024 7:04 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PSES] Reduce Speed of Moving Part to Reduce Risk
All valid points; however, I was taking my information from
that the single multi-color LED lamp
would not be a preferred option.
Jim Hulbert
From: John Woodgate
Sent: Friday, June 23, 2023 6:22 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PSES] Machine status visual Indicators
Good point. That's how drivers can cope
Good morning. Can anyone recommend a consultant for system integration of an
OEM Collaborative Robot (COBOT)?
Thanks.
Jim Hulbert
This email message may contain confidential, proprietary and/or privileged
information. It is intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s). If
you have
other energy sources, as well.
Thank you.
Jim Hulbert
This email message may contain confidential, proprietary and/or privileged
information. It is intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s). If
you have received it in error, please immediately advise the sender by reply
email and then
I think you need a VFD with Safe Torque Off (STO) function.
Jim Hulbert
From: Brian Kunde [mailto:bkundew...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2020 1:19 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: **External**[PSES] Fwd: Emergency Stop Function
If any of you have a Case of Corrona, I hope
.
Class I is powered by the AC mains, so NRTL is required because the device will
be used in the workplace. Class III products should technically be NRTL as
well as Ted stated below, but it is up to you (business decision) as this would
likely not be a focus of OSHA enforcement.
Jim Hulbert
From
$130,000.
We did not have an attached control room. There were also additional costs in
prepping the new location (electrical installation, HVAC, leveling the floor),
but I don't know what those costs were.
Jim Hulbert
From: Wiseman, Joshua [mailto:joshua.wise...@orthoclinicaldiagnostics.com
And what is “standard” today, may not be “standard” tomorrow.
Jim Hulbert
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@woodjohn.uk]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2019 3:08 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: **External**Re: [PSES] Guidelines v Standards v Codes
That's only one sort of standard
CAUTION: THIS EMAIL IS FROM AN EXTERNAL SOURCE. Internet links, office
documents or other attachments may contain viruses. Do not click on a link,
open or enable any file unless you trust the sender.
On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 14:39:46 +,
Jim Hulbert wrote:
> Yes, FCC requirements for this t
“Best effort and engineering judgement”. I like the sound of that.
From: Marko Radojicic [mailto:radojic...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2019 12:39 AM
To: Jim Hulbert
Cc: EMC-PSTC@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: **External**Re: [PSES] FCC Part 15 Testing in Situ
Hi
Tried this once
soon,
however.
Jim Hulbert
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@woodjohn.uk]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2019 3:05 AM
To: Jim Hulbert ; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: **External**Re: [PSES] FCC Part 15 Testing in Situ
Such very large equipment tends to be custom-designed, so three identical
on this forum have
experience doing this? I would expect conducted emissions to be reasonably
similar, but I can see how environmental influences could result in 3 different
sets of radiated emissions data. How do you make sense of the data?
Jim Hulbert
This email message may contain confidential
“Manufacturers are solely responsible for compliance with EMC standards for
NA.” Except for wireless radio equipment which generally does require TCB
testing and issuance of an FCC ID or Canada ICES certification number.
Jim Hulbert
From: Nyffenegger, Dave [mailto:dave.nyffeneg
.
From: Jim Hulbert
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 4:16 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Laser Safety
Hi. I would like to confirm laser safety requirements in an industrial machine
under the U.S. FDA regulations. If a Class II laser module (purchased OEM) is
installed in an industrial
above correct? If so, am I missing any
else?
Thanks.
Jim Hulbert
This email message may contain confidential, proprietary and/or privileged
information. It is intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s). If
you have received it in error, please immediately advise the sender by reply
We've had no problem getting an NRTL to approve a UL-listed, FDA/CDRH compliant
class 2 laser product in our end system. No additional testing was required.
Jim Hulbert
From: Nyffenegger, Dave [mailto:dave.nyffeneg...@bhemail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2018 9:11 AM
To: EMC-PSTC
That’s true, compliance with a prescribed limit is not a guarantee that the
device will not cause an interference problem.
What evidence has the cell phone company provided to show that the 780 MHz is
indeed coming from your system?
Jim Hulbert
From: Nyffenegger, Dave [mailto:dave.nyffeneg
with the adapter provided.
Jim Hulbert
From: Nyffenegger, Dave [mailto:dave.nyffeneg...@bhemail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2018 12:22 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: **External**Re: [PSES] DoC - 3rd party device to be included?
This email originated from outside the organization. Do
enclosure
requires minimum flammability ratings for use in the end product.
Jim Hulbert
From: Kunde, Brian [mailto:brian_ku...@lecotc.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2018 10:29 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] CB Certificate For Samsung Tablet - Need Contact
The power supply
I disagree with your NRTL. If the hipot test can degrade the insulation (we’re
talking about a single test on the production line), then the insulation system
is not up to par.
Jim
From: Nyffenegger, Dave [mailto:dave.nyffeneg...@bhemail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2018 12:18 AM
To:
pitfalls to
taking that approach until harmonized standards do actually get attached to the
RED?
Jim Hulbert
From: Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2018 6:55 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] RED products in EMC compliance part
Hi Charlie, I am
Thank you John and Boštjan for your replies. I'm glad internal power supplies
fall under the 4.1.1 clause, because beyond that there are no class 3 energy
sources and very few class 2 in the products I'm transitioning.
I'll think about how to handle the labelling.
Jim Hulbert
60417 label is placed alongside?
Thank you.
Jim Hulbert
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<emc-p...@ieee.org>
Did you get replies from other than humans?
Jim Hulbert
-Original Message-
From: Brian O'Connell [mailto:oconne...@tamuracorp.com]
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2018 2:31 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] light flicker
Good People,
Thanks to the humans that replied
s immunity of
telecommunications devices.Of course RoHS and WEEE also apply.
Jim Hulbert
From: Joe Randolph [mailto:j...@randolph-telecom.com]
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2018 1:02 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] What EU directive covers wireline phones after
apply to your
product such as EN 55032 for emissions). However, the EN 61000-4-x standards
are test methods and do NOT provide a presumption of conformity so need not be
listed.
Jim Hulbert
From: James Pawson (U3C) [mailto:ja...@unit3compliance.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, October 06, 2017 10:14 AM
Maybe Tech Pubs won’t use the word “shall” because plainlanguage.gov says not
to:
http://www.plainlanguage.gov/howto/guidelines/bigdoc/writeMust.cfm
Jim Hulbert
From: Kunde, Brian [mailto:brian_ku...@lecotc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 11:12 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re
,
there will be no argument, but I can't find anything in the regulations that
says it is mandatory.
Can someone on this list provide me a little guidance?
Thank you.
Jim Hulbert
Pitney Bowes
is considered to exist
if the temperature rise does not exceed 1 K in 5 min. It is not necessary to
control ambient temperature to any specific value, but the value should be
monitored and recorded.
Jim Hulbert
From: Doug Powell [mailto:doug...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2017 9:32 AM
To: EMC
So a Mercedes automated vehicle would make the decision of who lives and who
dies. That’s incredible.
Jim Hulbert
From: Pawson, James [mailto:james.paw...@echostar.com]
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2016 6:23 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Automated vehicles.
This article
ofessional equipment obviously orders replacement cartridges as needed.
Your thoughts are appreciated.
Thanks.
Jim Hulbert
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Societ
on raceway fill.
I have had an NRTL engineer cite a non-conformance for a raceway that was too
full. I argued that the cables were just low voltage signal cables but it
didn't make a difference to this engineer. We ended up using a larger raceway.
Any thoughts?
Jim Hulbert
am most interested
in the EMC, LVD, MD, and R Directives.
Thank you.
Jim Hulbert
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message
red button
from a previous message.
From: Jim Hulbert [mailto:jim.hulb...@pb.com]
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2016 10:39 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG<mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Subject: [PSES] Papua New Guinea Regulatory Requirements
I've been asked if there are any regulatory req
tion function. I am
looking for requirements for commercial products, not consumer.
Does anyone know of any requirements that I'm overlooking?
Thanks.
Jim Hulbert
-
This message is from the
.
They shall apply those provisions from 22 July 2019.
Jim Hulbert
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e
I didn't realize RED isn't mandatory until 2017. But that is indeed in the
transition clause. Takes a little pressure off some of us who didn't realize
that.
Jim Hulbert
From: Charlie Blackham [mailto:char...@sulisconsultants.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 2:34 AM
To: EMC-PSTC
shipping into the EU prior to CE marking, so how would customs be
handled?
Thanks for any insight.
Jim Hulbert
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discuss
The FCC also exempts a digital device utilized exclusively in an appliance,
e.g., microwave oven, dishwasher, clothes dryer, air conditioner (central or
window), from the its Part 15 technical requirements, so being rational
doesn't always make sense.
Jim Hulbert
-Original Message
the party
who's name/brand appears on the product. The importer is the party who places
equipment from outside the EU onto the EU market.
Jim Hulbert
From: peter_kelle...@dell.com [mailto:peter_kelle...@dell.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2015 6:58 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re
are generally reacting
(essentially are people re-testing or not).
Thanks.
Jim Hulbert
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message
Vessel
Directive applies to the tank. However, I'm not so sure that the PED applies
since the equipment is part of and totally contained within another system.
Any insight would be appreciated.
Jim Hulbert
our machine or is supplementary protection
sufficient? If we do need branch protection in the machine itself, is it
sufficient only for the main disconnect at the power input? Are there
differences in the requirements for U.S. and Europe?
Thanks.
Jim Hulbert
has to be printed. So I guess the question
is, is it OK to go 100% electronic?
Thanks.
Jim Hulbert
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list
Does the signature on a DoC need to be original or would an digital (or
scanned) signature be acceptable?
Jim Hulbert
-Original Message-
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 1:40 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Nameplate
circumstances is a
system considered private?
Thanks
- Jim Hulbert
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e
system (standards do not apply). Under what circumstances is a
system considered private?
Thanks
- Jim Hulbert
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
for the manuals,
but I don't see a requirement for it to be on a label. Is it acceptable to
have the instruction in the manual only?
Thanks.
Jim Hulbert
Pitney Bowes
-
This message is from the IEEE
Thanks for the replies. This product only has a single external power source,
so no label is required. (And yes, Boštjan, I meant appliance inlet, not
outlet).
Jim
From: Jim Hulbert [mailto:jim.hulb...@pb.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 1:09 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject
always make sense.
Jim Hulbert
-Original Message-
From: T.Sato [mailto:vef00...@nifty.ne.jp]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 6:20 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] construction machinery in USA
On Wed, 27 Aug 2014 00:26:23 +,
Ted Eckert ted.eck...@microsoft.com
and provide the evidence
because we couldn't afford to have this shipment held up any longer. My point
here is that I think Customs overstepped their authority.
Jim Hulbert
-
This message is from
This was in regard to the LVD.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Crane, Lauren [mailto:lauren.cr...@kla-tencor.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 3:33 PM
To: Jim Hulbert; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [PSES] Definition of unsafe product
Jim,
Was this for an EMCD issue, or other
OK. So I guess this would be a reasonable request from the authorities.
Lesson learned: make sure DoC's are up-to-date to avoid delays.
-Original Message-
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 3:35 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject:
The re-cast EMCD and LVD both state that the EU declaration must be translated
into the language required by a member state into which the apparatus is to be
made available. Does that mean a product sold throughout the EU must have a
declaration translated into all 20+ languages?
Jim Hulbert
I will of course investigate on my own. But is anything shockingly changed in
the new EMC, LVD, and RTTE Directives? Or for most of us will it simply mean
updating our Declarations of Conformity?
Jim Hulbert
Pitney Bowes
ICES-003 is the Industry Canada standard for emissions testing of ITE (CISPR
22). For very large ITE that cannot be tested on an open area test site, is
there a provision for testing in-situ?
Jim Hulbert
Pitney Bowes
if the installation environment is sufficiently controlled?
Any thoughts on this are appreciated.
Jim Hulbert
Pitney Bowes
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion
But there are also retailers who do NOT have shops/stores but only sell
on-line. So I think the definition of retailer is becoming murkier.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 2:15 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
The Declaration of Conformity must be issued by the Manufacturer or the
Manufacturer's authorized representative. TUV (any of them) CAN'T issue the
Declaration for you.Maybe there is something about your Declaration that is
not correct and customs is being picky about it.
Jim Hulbert
a regulatory requirement in
Ontario, are there other provinces that have the same or similar regulation?
Any guidance would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
Jim Hulbert
Pitney Bowes
-
This message is from
There are also amendments. As of 01 Mar 2013, this means EN60950-1:2006 plus
amendments A11:2006 , A1:2010, and A12:2011.
Jim Hulbert
-Original Message-
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Peter Tarver
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 11:35 AM
To: EMC-PSTC
Of course, if shielded cables, power cords, or special installation
instructions are required to insure compliance then this information should be
included in the EMC test report.
.and in the operator guide or user instructions.
Jim Hulbert
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p
time from one ESD
generator going to be the same as a pulse near the 1ns rise time from another
ESD generator? Both generators are within spec. Other parameters are also
pretty loose.
No wonder ESD testing can sometimes drive people nuts.
Jim Hulbert
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p
A unique DoC for each unit would be unfortunate. Cumbersome without being
useful. The only circumstance I can think of where this would be reasonable
would be if each unit itself is unique (i.e. custom).
Jim Hulbert
Pitney Bowes
-Original Message-
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p
in which
case the user may be required to take adequate measures. How binding is that
requirement?
Jim Hulbert
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Bill Owsley
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 10:30 PM
To: oconne...@tamuracorp.com; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
[mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of John Woodgate
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 9:24 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: Class A or Class B on Declaration of Conformity
In message
7B9D892F88F070469771832D78B3086E062AC1C4@013-BR1MPN1-012.MGDPBI.global.p
vt, dated Thu, 14 Feb 2013, Jim
On CE Declarations of Conformity, where EN 55022 standard has been referenced,
is it a requirement that the limit that was applied (class A or class B) also
be stated? We show the limit on our DoCs, but some of our OEMs do not. I
can't find where it is actually required.
Jim Hulbert
That is a frustrating aspect of EU Directives. Might not be a huge deal for
consumer products that have a short life-span, but for commercial/industrial
products which have longer lives it can be a nuisance. I don't know how many
times I've been asked but aren't we grandfathered?
Jim Hulbert
be supplied with each piece of equipment, or
as John stated: One full copy should go with every shipment that crosses an
EU border, or a Member State border...?
Jim Hulbert
-Original Message-
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of John Woodgate
Sent: Thursday, November
organization with EU
recognition and experience in in-situ testing be used.
Jim Hulbert
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Charlie Blackham
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 3:28 AM
To: Ken Javor; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: EN 61000-4-3 for large
Thank you for responses I've received. They've been very helpful.
Jim Hulbert
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Jim Hulbert
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 4:35 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Are Product Safety Certifications Mandatory in Canada
be certified by one of
the Standards Council of Canada approved test laboratories to Canadian
standards?
Jim Hulbert
Pitney Bowes
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc
-
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf Of Jim Hulbert
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2012 12:08 PM
To: EMC-PSTC (emc-p...@ieee.org)
Subject: Impact on NRTL Certification - Refurbished/Remanufactured Products
What is the impact on the original NRTL certification of a product
to
maintaining NTRL certifications for these products.
Jim Hulbert
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your
It's probably common knowledge on THIS forum that 120-240V indicates an
autoranging power supply and 120/240V indicates there is a switch setting for
one or the other. I'll bet the average consumer has no idea, though.
Jim Hulbert
-Original Message-
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc
The words such as in paragraph 3 of claus D.1 would indicate that biconical
and log-periodic dipole array antennas are examples of broadband antennas, not
an exhaustive list. Poorly worded if the intent was to specify the acceptable
types of broadband antennas and to exclude any types.
Jim
This question has probably been asked before, but is a digital signature on a
EU DofC an acceptable signature form?
Thanks.
Jim Hulbert
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list
Many layers of government...municipal, county, state...
-Original Message-
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Richard Nute
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 3:34 PM
To: 'John Woodgate'; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [PSES] Mandatory NRTL certification
Thank you everyone for the helpful feedback. The consensus is clearly: Save my
back and leave the absorber and ferrite tiles in place. Compare radiated
emissions measurements in the chamber to those on the OATS (several suggested a
comb generator for this purpose). Assign an adjustment
test.
Thanks.
Jim Hulbert
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org
All emc-pstc postings are archived
supercedes previous standards on 24 Jan 2013. A12 appears to be incorporating
corrigendums (or is that corrigendi?). Does this mean that A12 doesn't add
anything substantially new?
Jim Hulbert
-
This message is from the IEEE
Article 4 refers to the management system set out in Annex V.
Jim Hulbert
Pitney Bowes
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of John Woodgate
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 10:54 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: First EUP Regulation implementation regarding standby
But unless A1 is published in the OJ, it is not a harmonized standard under the
EMC Directive, correct?
Jim Hulbert, Group Leader
TSO Competitive Compliance Engineering
Pitney Bowes, 35 Waterview Drive, Shelton, CT 06484
Tel: 203-924-3621 (Internal 442-3621)
Fax: 203-924-3352 (Internal 442
that apply to his
product. Apparently for EN 55022 that is still the 1 GHz max frequency for
measurement. For time-to-market and cost reasons, they stop there.
Jim Hulbert, Group Leader
TSO Competitive Compliance Engineering
Pitney Bowes, 35 Waterview Drive, Shelton, CT 06484
Tel: 203-924-3621
in the OJ (I don't think), then it's not yet applicable under the
EMC Directive. Please correct me if I am misunderstanding anything.
Jim Hulbert, Group Leader
TSO Competitive Compliance Engineering
Pitney Bowes, 35 Waterview Drive, Shelton, CT 06484
Tel: 203-924-3621 (Internal 442-3621)
Fax
We likewise were never notified that the BS version was withdrawn, if that is
the case. It's rather disturbing to think that we may be paying money for and
following standards that are wrong.
Jim Hulbert, Group Leader
TSO Competitive Compliance Engineering
Pitney Bowes, 35 Waterview Drive
EN 55022:2006 does indeed include the limits for radiated emissions in the
range 1 GHz to 6 GHz. Look at section 6.2. This standard is published in
the OJ and becomes compulsory under the EMC Directive as of 1 Oct 2009.
Jim Hulbert, Group Leader
TSO Competitive Compliance Engineering
question, if you apply +8kV discharge followed by -8kV discharge, without
removing the charge from the EUT between the discharges, then the actual
potential voltage is 16kV which could very well overstress the product.
Jim Hulbert
Pitney Bowes
definition of the ferrite devices. Does anyone have any updated
information on the status of this amendment, which if it goes through as
is, must be met by August of 2003?
Thanks.
Jim Hulbert
Pitney Bowes
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product
or is there a simpler way?
Thanks.
Jim Hulbert
Pitney Bowes
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
To cancel your
. AC mains, telecom, I/O to remote control units).
ANSI C63.4 does not specify this. If I follow the EN 55022 procedure, is
it necessary to repeat without the ferrite clamps in order to satisfy the
ANSI test procedure?
Thanks.
Jim Hulbert
Pitney Bowes
.
Jim Hulbert
Senior Engineer
Pitney Bowes
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
To cancel your subscription, send mail
Try sending an email to oeti...@fcc.gov. I've received responses to
questions within 1 day.
Jim Hulbert
Pitney Bowes
rehel...@mmm.com
Sorry, I meant whichever is LOWER. (Can't get away with ANYTHING on this
forum!)
- Forwarded by Jim Hulbert/MSD/US/PBI on 03/27/2002 08:27 AM
(or
40 GHz, whichever is greater) for highest frequency generated above 1000
MHz.
Jim Hulbert
Senior Engineer
Pitney Bowes
rehel...@mmm.com
Tania and Amund,
IMHO, the margin of compliance should be at least equal to or greater than
the measurement uncertainty. Measurement uncertainty for radiated
emissions is generally in the range of 3 to 4 dB for most labs.
Jim Hulbert
Pitney Bowes
exchange of knowledge and unique experiences between compliance engineering
professionals. I believe you have served this purpose better than most and
I hope you re-consider your decision not to participate any longer.
Jim Hulbert
Senior Engineer - EMC
Pitney Bowes
with CISPR 22 (or some
variation thereof) also postponed implementation of the 1997 version? My
immediate concern is Australia.
Any information members of this group can share is greatly appreciated.
Jim Hulbert
Senior Engineer - EMC
Pitney Bowes
---
This message
. If the equipment falls under the scope of EN 55014-2 for
immunity, then it naturally also falls under the scope of EN 55014-1 for
emissions, and vice versa. These product family standards apply with
precedence over generic standards.
Jim Hulbert
Pitney Bowes
wo...@sensormatic.com@majordomo.ieee.org
verification process for Part 15. The details and logistics of this
next step in the de-regulation process are not yet worked out.
Jim Hulbert
j...@aol.com on 01/18/2001 03:56:52 PM
Please respond to j...@aol.com
To: ctho...@patton.com, emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
cc:(bcc: Jim Hulbert/MSD
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
