However, if a CW carrier exists, the level is still valid for a measurement.
Cortland, KA5S
On 4/11/2019 14:59 PM, Sykes, Bob wrote:
And yes, you are no longer using the specified CISPR RBW for the
measurement so YMMV J
-
This
DeWitt, AB1LF
Milford, MA
From: Ken Javor
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2019 7:23 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] [EXTERNAL] Re: [PSES] EMI testing with ambient
If both signal and noise are broadband and not synchronized, then they would
add rss. It would be interesting
From: "Grasso, Charles"
Reply-To: "Grasso, Charles"
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 23:10:51 +
To:
Conversation: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PSES] EMI testing with ambient
Subject: Re: [PSES] [EXTERNAL] Re: [PSES] EMI testing with ambient
Thanks Bob Yes I have had to use this technique occas
] [EXTERNAL] Re: [PSES] EMI testing with ambient
This message originated outside of DISH and was sent by:
owner-emc-p...@listserv.ieee.org<mailto:owner-emc-p...@listserv.ieee.org>
Also not rocket science or breaking news (to many). If you are measuring a
CW NB signal in the presence of BB a
signal. The effect of changing BW using a waterfall display should be
dramatic and illuminating.
Ken Javor
Phone: (256) 650-5261
From: "Sykes, Bob"
Reply-To: "Sykes, Bob"
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 18:59:38 +
To:
Conversation: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PSES] EMI testing with ambien
there are limits to this
And yes, you are no longer using the specified CISPR RBW for the measurement so
YMMV :)
From: Ken Javor [mailto:ken.ja...@emccompliance.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2019 12:01 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PSES] EMI testing with ambient
CAUTION
6 matches
Mail list logo
