.
Regards
Piotr Galka
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Tarver"
To:
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 6:44 PM
Subject: Re: [PSES] EN 50581 part/range of parts
From: Piotr Galka
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 05:15
The fourth side: We (I hope I will not be alone) think
point 1 i
> From: Piotr Galka
> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 05:15
>
> The fourth side: We (I hope I will not be alone) think
> point 1 is an error - it should call for "No... (unique
> identification of document):"
I will propose yet another position. This position appears to me to
logically suit the i
In message , dated Fri, 15 Nov
2013, Piotr Galka writes:
"If I wouldn't know that it is stupidity I could think it is sabotage.
There is a similar epithet in London slang: 'It's not a carve-up, just a
cock-up.' (The latter refers to fitting an arrow to a bow upside down,
so the 'cock' feat
om: Crane, Lauren
To: Piotr Galka ; EMC-PSTC
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 1:13 AM
Subject: RE: [PSES] EN 50581 part/range of parts
Piotr,
This topic illustrates a concept that can be called the "supremacy of
practicality".
I agree with you that the RoHS direc
rane
KLA-Tencor
From: Piotr Galka [mailto:piotr.ga...@micromade.pl]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 10:02 AM
To: EMC-PSTC; Crane, Lauren
Subject: Re: [PSES] EN 50581 part/range of parts
Lauren and others,
I have read (I believe carefully) this FAQ.
>From Q8.14 and Directive Article 7(g) I se
hould add to that list that:
- light is not electromagnetic field.
Best Regards
Piotr Galka
- Original Message -
From: Crane, Lauren
To: Piotr Galka ; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 2:22 AM
Subject: RE: [PSES] EN 50581 part/range of parts
Piotr,
Re
alism country)
continually comes to my mind:
"If I wouldn't know that it is stupidity I could think it is sabotage."
- Original Message -
From: Crane, Lauren
To: Piotr Galka ; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 2:22 AM
Subject: RE: [P
om: Piotr Galka [mailto:piotr.ga...@micromade.pl]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 8:27 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] EN 50581 part/range of parts
To English language standard experts,
How do you understand "specific part" and "specific range of parts" in
To English language standard experts,
How do you understand "specific part" and "specific range of parts" in last
sentence in EN 50581:2012 Cl. 4.3.3 (a):
"Such declarations ... shall cover a specific ... part ... or a specific range
of ... parts..."
According to:
- directives understanding of
9 matches
Mail list logo
