Re: [PSES] EN 62368-3:2017-02-15 power limits

2017-03-09 Thread JIM WIESE
rom: Richard Nute [mailto:ri...@ieee.org] Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2017 5:36 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG<mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> Subject: Re: [PSES] EN 62368-3:2017-02-15 power limits Hi Chuck: I have reviewed the IEC draft version of EN 62368-3, 108/639/CD. As near as I c

Re: [PSES] EN 62368-3:2017-02-15 power limits

2017-03-09 Thread John Woodgate
, 2017 5:57 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] EN 62368-3:2017-02-15 power limits To add to Rich's answer which is correct; I am very involved in this now, and at the recent TC108 US TAG meeting in NC, the US committee unanimously voted no as this standard has so many tec

Re: [PSES] EN 62368-3:2017-02-15 power limits

2017-03-09 Thread JIM WIESE
er can be as high as 100 watts. In other cases, the current is limited to 1.3 amperes. There is no one answer to your question. Best regards, Rich From: Chuck August-McDowell [mailto:chu...@meyersound.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2017 1:49 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG<mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IE

Re: [PSES] EN 62368-3:2017-02-15 power limits

2017-03-09 Thread Chuck August-McDowell
Thank you for the reply's Chuck McDowell Compliance Specialist Meyer Sound Laboratories Inc. Direct: 510-540-4670 From: Chuck August-McDowell [mailto:chu...@meyersound.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2017 1:49 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] EN 62368-3:2017-02-15 power limits

Re: [PSES] EN 62368-3:2017-02-15 power limits

2017-03-09 Thread Erick Latvala
ERV.IEEE.ORG<mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> Subject: Re: [PSES] EN 62368-3:2017-02-15 power limits Does anyone know where I can obtain or purchase a copy of this draft standard? A source in the UK would be preferable. Many thanks; Ian McBurney Design & Compliance Engineer. Alle

Re: [PSES] EN 62368-3:2017-02-15 power limits

2017-03-09 Thread John Woodgate
U. UK T: 01326 372070 E: ian.mcbur...@allen-heath.com <mailto:ian.mcbur...@allen-heath.com> From: Richard Nute [mailto:ri...@ieee.org] Sent: 08 March 2017 23:36 To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG <mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> Subject: Re: [PSES] EN 62368-3:2017-02-15 power lim

Re: [PSES] EN 62368-3:2017-02-15 power limits

2017-03-09 Thread McBurney, Ian
..@allen-heath.com From: Richard Nute [mailto:ri...@ieee.org] Sent: 08 March 2017 23:36 To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] EN 62368-3:2017-02-15 power limits Hi Chuck: I have reviewed the IEC draft version of EN 62368-3, 108/639/CD. As near as I can tell, the power limit

Re: [PSES] EN 62368-3:2017-02-15 power limits

2017-03-08 Thread Richard Nute
to 1.3 amperes. There is no one answer to your question. Best regards, Rich From: Chuck August-McDowell [mailto:chu...@meyersound.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2017 1:49 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] EN 62368-3:2017-02-15 power limits Greetings from Berkeley

[PSES] EN 62368-3:2017-02-15 power limits

2017-03-08 Thread Chuck August-McDowell
Greetings from Berkeley, I am curious to know the power limits described in the draft standard EN 62368-3:2017-02-15. Titled; Audio/video, information and communication technology equipment - Safety -- Part 3: DC power transfer through communication cables or ports Any information would be

[PSES] EN 62368-3:2017-02-15 power limits

2017-03-08 Thread Chuck August-McDowell
Greetings from Berkeley, I am curious to know the power limits described in the draft standard EN 62368-3:2017-02-15. Titled; Audio/video, information and communication technology equipment - Safety -- Part 3: DC power transfer through communication cables or ports Any information would be