Leave it to our resident historian to pull off the Reference Handbook for Radio
Engineers, 2nd edition, 1946 from his library!
___
I'm here to help you succeed! Feel free to call or email with any questions
related to EMC or EMI troubleshooting - at no obligation. I'm
, 2nd edition, 1946:
>
>
>
>
>
> Ken Javor
> Phone: (256) 650-5261
>
> > From: John Barnes
> > Reply-To: John Barnes
> > Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 10:43:29 -0500
> > To:
> > Subject: Re: [PSES] AW: [PSES] Friday Question - table of
> electrochemical
gt;
>
> Bernd
>
>
>
>
>
> *Von:* Douglas E Powell
> *Gesendet:* Freitag, 5. Februar 2021 19:05
> *An:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> *Betreff:* [PSES] Friday Question - table of electrochemical potentials
>
>
>
> For years, I've used the same or similar table for
>From the Reference Handbook for Radio Engineers, 2nd edition, 1946:
Ken Javor
Phone: (256) 650-5261
> From: John Barnes
> Reply-To: John Barnes
> Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 10:43:29 -0500
> To:
> Subject: Re: [PSES] AW: [PSES] Friday Question - table of electroche
Dürrer,
The table in the Wikipedia article
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galvanic_corrosion#Anodic_index
has more entries, is more descriptive, and doesn't totally agree with
Table 7-1 on page 156 of Gershon J. Wheeler's book, The Design of
Electronic Equipment: A Manual for Production and
?
Kind regards,
Bernd
Von: Douglas E Powell
Gesendet: Freitag, 5. Februar 2021 19:05
An: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Betreff: [PSES] Friday Question - table of electrochemical potentials
For years, I've used the same or similar table for dissimilar metals and the
possibility of corrosion
For years, I've used the same or similar table for dissimilar metals and
the possibility of corrosion for "pairs of common metals in use". This
table shows up in many IEC based standards and no one I know questions the
validity. I got curious as to the source and why this particular list of
7 matches
Mail list logo
