[PSES] IEC 60950-1 A2:2013 clause 1.7.1.3

2014-08-15 Thread Sundstrom, Mike
Thanks everyone for your replies. The consensus is that every symbol needs to be explained in the owner's manual. Thanks, Michael Sundstrom Garmin Compliance Engineer 2-2606 (913) 440-1540 Whatever your discipline, become a student of excellence in all things. Take every opportunity to

[PSES] IEC 60950-1 A2:2013 clause 1.7.1.3

2014-08-14 Thread Sundstrom, Mike
I have a question about interpretation of this clause: 1.7.1.3 Use of graphical symbols Graphical symbols placed on the equipment, whether required by this standard or not, shall be in accordance with IEC 60417 or ISO 3864-2 or ISO 7000, if available. In the absence of suitable symbols, the

Re: [PSES] IEC 60950-1 A2:2013 clause 1.7.1.3

2014-08-14 Thread Crane, Lauren
standards (after paying for them) to look up their meaning (not a very reasonable expectation). Regards, Lauren Crane KLA-Tencor From: Sundstrom, Mike [mailto:mike.sundst...@garmin.com] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 3:09 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] IEC 60950-1 A2:2013 clause

Re: [PSES] IEC 60950-1 A2:2013 clause 1.7.1.3

2014-08-14 Thread Doug Powell
] IEC 60950-1 A2:2013 clause 1.7.1.3 I have a question about interpretation of this clause: *1.7.1.3 Use of graphical symbols* Graphical symbols placed on the equipment, whether required by this standard or not, shall be in accordance with IEC 60417 or ISO 3864-2 or ISO 7000, if available

Re: [PSES] IEC 60950-1 A2:2013 clause 1.7.1.3

2014-08-14 Thread Ted Eckert
@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] IEC 60950-1 A2:2013 clause 1.7.1.3 It seems to me the only reasonable interpretation is A (All symbols). If that were *not* the correct answer it would imply either 1) the IEC/ISO symbols were perfectly self-explanatory (and I think they are not), or 2