Re: [PSES] add 60950 to a new supplier's product which only has FCC?

Jim, Rich and all who replied, Thanks for the feedback. There is no intentional transmitter. I don't believe it's a case of wanting to hide Company A -- it appears to be a case of economics and differing views of safety & liability,which has surprised me a bit. Cheers, Adam On Tue, Jan 31,

Re: [PSES] add 60950 to a new supplier's product which only has FCC?

Adam, depends on how well you want company A hidden from company B's customers. As Rich commented on safety I will comment on FCC. On the FCC depends on whether there is a transmitter involved as to what path can be used and how to address. If there is no transmitter, you can just issue a

Re: [PSES] add 60950 to a new supplier's product which only has FCC?

, except to say the safety and FCC certifications are independent of each other. Rich From: Adam Dixon [mailto:lanterna.viri...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2017 1:18 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] add 60950 to a new supplier's product which only has FCC? Similar

[PSES] add 60950 to a new supplier's product which only has FCC?

Similar to last year's Company A/B Multiple Listee for CE discussion, is there a good path to take a finished product built by Company A which only has FCC certification and have Company B add 60950 safety certification? Seems like it should be an "all or nothing" proposition (i.e. Company B