[mailto:john.al...@uk.thalesgroup.com]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 09:13
To: 'Enci'; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: EMI filter hazards
Hi Enci Other Folks
Comments:
1) The actual value of the capacitor may not the most significant factor -
it is the actual voltage effect on the user
them and the filters are also lower.
Regards
John Allen
-Original Message-
From: Enci [mailto:e...@cinepower.com]
Sent: 29 October 2001 12:35
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: EMI filter hazards
At 09:31 29/10/01 -, John Crabb wrote:
IEC60950 requires that capacitor
At 09:31 29/10/01 -, John Crabb wrote:
IEC60950 requires that capacitor exceeding 0.1uF should have a means of
discharge resulting
in a time constant not exceeding 1 second for pluggable equipment Type A.
.. a means of discharge
As I understand it there is no need to blindly install a
...@aol.com]
Sent: 26 October 2001 12:42
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: EMI filter hazards
Many of us incorporate these little babies in our designs, and good design
practices require their placement at the enclosure threshhold to prevent
re-radiation. This sometimes means the filter is upstream
:42
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: EMI filter hazards
Many of us incorporate these little babies in our designs, and good design
practices require their placement at the enclosure threshhold to prevent
re-radiation. This sometimes means the filter is upstream of the/any mains
switch or breaker
Many of us incorporate these little babies in our designs, and good design
practices require their placement at the enclosure threshhold to prevent
re-radiation. This sometimes means the filter is upstream of the/any mains
switch or breaker.
In these cases, what can be done to mitigate the
6 matches
Mail list logo
