Re: Manufacturer's I.D. for Europe

2002-02-12 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Enci e...@cinepower.com wrote (in 3.0.6.32.2 0020212191610.00b07...@mail.cinepower.com) about 'Manufacturer's I.D. for Europe', on Tue, 12 Feb 2002: If I recall correctly, in the EEC claims are not restricted to the final re-seller or the person/organisation to place

RE: Manufacturer's I.D. for Europe

2002-02-12 Thread Enci
: geor...@lexmark.com [mailto:geor...@lexmark.com] Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 3:52 PM To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: Manufacturer's I.D. for Europe What are your thoughts on this issue? The prevailing ITE safety standards (e.g. IEC 60950) require markings that include the manufacturer's

RE: Manufacturer's I.D. for Europe

2002-02-12 Thread John Juhasz
-Original Message- From: geor...@lexmark.com [mailto:geor...@lexmark.com] Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 3:52 PM To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: Manufacturer's I.D. for Europe What are your thoughts on this issue? The prevailing ITE safety standards (e.g. IEC 60950) require markings

Manufacturer's I.D. for Europe

2002-02-11 Thread georgea
What are your thoughts on this issue? The prevailing ITE safety standards (e.g. IEC 60950) require markings that include the manufacturer's name, trademark, or identification mark (section 1.7.1). It is not uncommon for a manufacturer to allow another company to market their products under