NSA above 1 GHz becomes (technically spoken) less relevant , as it
becomes increasingly easier to calibrate antennas as if they
were used in free space. The short wavelength makes is easy to choose
the antenna-antenna distance very short compared to the height of them.
In this way reflections
).
Mike Cantwell michael.cantw...@flextronics.com on 01/03/2001 02:06:20 PM
Please respond to Mike Cantwell michael.cantw...@flextronics.com
To: 'emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org' emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
cc:(bcc: Robert E. Heller/US-Corporate/3M/US)
Subject: NSA above
voice
503.685.7256 fax
don.rho...@infocus.com
-Original Message-
From: Mike Cantwell [mailto:michael.cantw...@flextronics.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2001 12:06 PM
To: 'emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org'
Subject: NSA above 1 GHz
Does anyone know of any Normalized Site Attenuation
. Pettit
Intel Corporation
-Original Message-
From: Mike Cantwell [mailto:michael.cantw...@flextronics.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2001 12:06 PM
To: 'emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org'
Subject: NSA above 1 GHz
Does anyone know of any Normalized Site Attenuation measurements above 1
GHz? I'm
Does anyone know of any Normalized Site Attenuation measurements above 1
GHz? I'm specifically interested in whether or not ANSI C63.4 or CISPR-22 is
planning this, and if so, is there any preliminary info?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Mike Cantwell
5 matches
Mail list logo