Re: Public Health and Safety Signs - Tomfoolery so delete if you

200105211432.kaa24...@interlock2.lexmark.com, oover...@lexmark.com inimitably wrote: I once read a safety article (tongue-in-cheek I believe) that said that the safety industry was weaking the species by allowing the weak and feable to continue exist and procreate. I believe that this was

RE: Public Health and Safety Signs - Tomfoolery so delete if you don't have the time.

: Friday, May 18, 2001 4:40 PM To: 'Michael Mertinooke'; wo...@sensormatic.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: Public Health and Safety Signs - Tomfoolery so delete if you don't have the time. Here in the US, awhile back, a woman was suing the liquor industry because she gave

Re: Public Health and Safety Signs - Tomfoolery so delete if you

@interlock.lexmark.com, woods%sensormatic@interlock.lexmark.com, emc-pstc%majordomo.ieee@interlock.lexmark.com cc:(bcc: Oscar Overton/Lex/Lexmark) Subject: Re: Public Health and Safety Signs - Tomfoolery so delete if you Gary, Kudos to you for trying;-- but I think you

Re: Public Health and Safety Signs - Tomfoolery so delete if you

Subject: RE: Public Health and Safety Signs - Tomfoolery so delete if you Here in the US, awhile back, a woman was suing the liquor industry because she gave birth to a fetal alcohol syndrome child. Apparently, nobody in their right mind would assume that consuming a fifth of whiskey a day could

RE: Public Health and Safety Signs - Tomfoolery so delete if you don't have the time.

Here in the US, awhile back, a woman was suing the liquor industry because she gave birth to a fetal alcohol syndrome child. Apparently, nobody in their right mind would assume that consuming a fifth of whiskey a day could be harmful to a developing fetus making the liquor industry