RE: Battery Safety

2000-09-27 Thread Barry Ma
Scott, Thanks for the nice answer. Barry Ma - On Tue, 26 September 2000, Scott Lacey wrote: Barry, These use magnetic coupling to transfer the charging energy. In essence, the transformer secondary is inside the toothbrush handle, along with the rectifiers and rechargeable

Re: Battery Safety

2000-09-27 Thread mike harris
Message- From: Barry Ma barry...@altavista.com To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org Date: Monday, September 25, 2000 6:18 PM Subject: Re: Battery Safety Chris' email reminds me of a relevant question: The charging stand for a battery

Re: Battery Safety

2000-09-26 Thread Barry Ma
Chris' email reminds me of a relevant question: The charging stand for a battery-driven toothbrush (Sonicare) has no contact with the toothbrush. What is the charging mechanism? Is it safer than other battery? Best Regards, Barry Ma

Re: Battery Safety

2000-09-25 Thread ed . rauch
I've seen this resistor used for the low battery alarm circuit. It keeps the battery voltage from rising as load is shed and confusing the low battery alarm circuit. There is no safety reason that I know of. 91K ohm is an odd value though, left overs from another product? I'm assuming that the

RE: Battery Safety

2000-09-25 Thread Kevin Harris
Hi, I've seen this done before on low current designs. Sometimes when you replace the batteries in this type of design the circuit voltage does not have time to drop completely away due to the charge saved on bulk capacitors. When the new batteries are added the circuit comes up in a peculiar

Re: Battery Safety

2000-09-25 Thread Ralph Cameron
Chris: Is the battery a rechargeable? Have you tried disconnecting the 91K reisstor and measuring the resulting voltage increase? Doesn't make sense to me. Ralph Cameron EMC Consulting and Suppression of Consumer Electronics (After sale) - Original Message - From: Maxwell, Chris