Mike, Again - perfect clarification. Thanks a million. Dan Sincerely, Daniel C. Kinney Lead Qualification Engineer
Horner APG, LLC Advanced Products Group 640 N. Sherman Drive Indianapolis, IN 46201 Phone: (317) 916-4274 ext. 462 FAX: (317) 916-4287 Email: dan.kin...@heapg.com Website: http://www.heapg.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Mertinooke [SMTP:mertino...@skyskan.com] > Sent: Monday, March 27, 2000 10:36 AM > To: 'Dan Kinney (A)' > Subject: RE: Immunity Port distinction EN 50082-2:1995 > > Yeah, no sweat. > If the ports are for signal functions, and if unplugging the > port will not change the process, then this is Table 2. If you > unplug the cable and the process stops or goes whacky, then > you are Table 3. > > One example is if you have a programming panel for setup > purposes, or if you have a port to monitor some process now > and then. This is incidental usage and has no direct bearing > on the safety or operation of the PLC system. So the more > relaxed numbers apply. Sometimes, in fact, you can avoid test > entirely (e.g. a blocked-off port that is only used for > troubleshooting). > > > > >Can anyone distinguish the difference between ports described in Table 2 > and > >Table 3 and advise which category my ports apply. > > See ya. > Mike Mertinooke ------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Jim Bacher: jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com Michael Garretson: pstc_ad...@garretson.org For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org
