Re: Network Equipment and UL 1459/1950

1999-03-30 Thread Jim Bacher
Posting for a non list member.. Victor L. Boersma vboer...@compuserve.com 03/29 5:54 PM Message text written by INTERNET:t...@world.std.com I have to agree that there shouldn't be another US (UL) standard for network equipment when the equipment can be incorporated into UL1950. UL1950 can be

Re: Network Equipment and UL 1459/1950

1999-03-29 Thread Victor L. Boersma
Message text written by INTERNET:t...@world.std.com I have to agree that there shouldn't be another US (UL) standard for network equipment when the equipment can be incorporated into UL1950. UL1950 can be revised to clarify the network equipment requirements, perhaps as a deviation or an appendix

Re: Network Equipment and UL 1459/1950

1999-03-29 Thread Robert Tims
Hello All, I have to agree that there shouldn't be another US (UL) standard for network equipment when the equipment can be incorporated into UL1950. UL1950 can be revised to clarify the network equipment requirements, perhaps as a deviation or an appendix (annex), or just rewording the existing

RE: Network Equipment and UL 1459/1950

1999-03-26 Thread Grant, Tania (Tania)
...@ustech-lab.com] Sent: Thursday, March 25, 1999 7:03 AM To: 'emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org' Subject: RE: Network Equipment and UL 1459/1950 We just completed an approval with the exact same situation. I cannot speak for your prodcut since I have not reviewed it. I can provide a contact at UL

Re: Network Equipment and UL 1459/1950

1999-03-25 Thread Peter Merguerian
Jim, Your interpretaion is 100% correct. I have personally Listed many products with UL1950 Third Edition with a supplemental earthing terminal as you described below with no basic insulation between the TNV-2/TNV-3 circuits and SELV/Earth. The standard specifies that basic insulation is one

Re: Network Equipment and UL 1459/1950

1999-03-25 Thread Victor L. Boersma
Message text written by INTERNET:t...@world.std.com In my view, these exemptions are specifically targeted at equipment such as PBXs and network equipment that are typically installed by service personnel and include hardwired grounding. When Telecom equipment (of the non-network equipment

RE: Network Equipment and UL 1459/1950

1999-03-25 Thread Jody Leber
To: emc-pstc; 'TREG' Cc: jim.wi...@adtran.com Subject:Re: Network Equipment and UL 1459/1950 In a message dated 3/24/99, jim.wi...@adtran.com writes: The only design criteria with regard to insulation in Bellcore standards or UL 1459 is a hi-pots test. Creepage and clearance do not exist

Re: Network Equipment and UL 1459/1950

1999-03-24 Thread JPR3
In a message dated 3/24/99, jim.wi...@adtran.com writes: The only design criteria with regard to insulation in Bellcore standards or UL 1459 is a hi-pots test. Creepage and clearance do not exist in traditional C.O. equipment (just look at wire wrapped backplanes). Dear Jim and others:

RE: Network Equipment and UL 1459/1950

1999-03-24 Thread Frank McCaughey
A couple of comments: -As Randy and Jim Brunssen will recall, an exhaustive comparison of UL 950 and 1459 took place under TR 41.7.1 For those who still have the paperwork, reams of rationale still abound. This comparison, and the harmonization of UL 1459 and CSA Standard C22.2 No. 225, were the

RE: Network Equipment and UL 1459/1950

1999-03-24 Thread Gary McInturff
; harry.vanza...@telops.gte.com; chuck_gr...@smtp.nynex.com; tto...@uswest.com; jmla...@uswest.com; mben...@uswest.com; sbi...@hotmail.com; Larry Todd; Keith Kuhn Subject:RE: Network Equipment and UL 1459/1950 Jim, Thank you for giving us

RE: Network Equipment and UL 1459/1950

1999-03-24 Thread JIM WIESE
...@telops.gte.com; chuck_gr...@smtp.nynex.com; tto...@uswest.com; jmla...@uswest.com; mben...@uswest.com; sbi...@hotmail.com; Larry Todd; Keith Kuhn Subject: RE: Network Equipment and UL 1459/1950 Jim, Thank you for giving us an opportunity to respond. It would have been very helpful