Yes
I returned to work this past Monday only to see that I received over 80
e-mails over the weekend. After I recovered from the shock I started opening
them, only to find about 60 or so were repeats from the last part of last
week. I also have seen a few repeated these past few days. It appears
George,
I've noticed that too, I thought I was alone
Bill Addiss
At 03:26 PM 3/13/01 -0500, geor...@lexmark.com wrote:
Has anyone noticed that postings to this listserver repeat several days later?
For example, Chris Colgan's question about switching NRTLs first posted about
3/6/01
We have asked the IEEE to look into it.
Jim
Jim Bacher, Senior Engineer
Paxar - Monarch
e-mail: jim_bac...@monarch.com
voice: 1-937-865-2020
fax: 1-937-865-2048
Reply Separator
Subject:Repeat Postings
Author: geor...@lexmark.com
List-Post:
Assuming original approval is to UL1950 you might try adding an NRTL, then
after a period of time drop the original NRTL. This way you take advantage
of any agreements between the NRTLs. Typical costs for adding another NRTL
using shared data are 60% of the cost of the original investigation.
Interesting . . .
When I came into the office Monday morning . . . I had a list of messages
that
appeared to be the same ones that I read, sorted, and or deleted on Friday.
Hmmm . . . .
John Juhasz
Fiber Options
Bohemia, NY
-Original Message-
From: geor...@lexmark.com
Hi George and all:
Yes, we are having some listserver multiple send
problems. Please bear with us while we fix the
problem.
Please direct all such questions to me or to one
of our admins at the bottom of the message. Even
your message could get sent multiple times, so we
want to keep the
Does anyone have a copy of the EN61000-3-3 Millenium Ammendment they
would be willing to share?
On Fri, 2 Mar 2001 08:22:08 +, John Woodgate
j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk wrote:
snip
I don't suppose you have the big 'Millennium' amendment to the standard,
which STILL isn't published yet? Even though
Yup...thought it was a really neat case of deja vu.
Cheers,
Kaz Gawrzyjal
-Original Message-
From: geor...@lexmark.com [mailto:geor...@lexmark.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 2:27 PM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Repeat Postings
Has anyone noticed that postings to this
Has anyone noticed that postings to this listserver repeat several days later?
For example, Chris Colgan's question about switching NRTLs first posted about
3/6/01 appeared again this afternoon?
George
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society
3aae6bf8.1bb0c...@broadcom.com, Jim Freeman free...@broadcom.com
wrote:
This story is true but I heard that it was not Henry ford but Chicago Edison
who
was having problems and the consulting Engineer was Steinmetz. This was talked
about in our Engineering 100 course at Purdue.
The story is
This story is true but I heard that it was not Henry ford but Chicago Edison who
was having problems and the consulting Engineer was Steinmetz. This was talked
about in our Engineering 100 course at Purdue.
Jim Freeman
Rich Nute wrote:
Hello from San Diego:
One of my colleagues has added
Group,
Would someone please provide both of the two possible symbols allowed for
the separate collection of batteries, under the battery directive
91/157/EEC?
Or perhaps, a pointer to where they are stored on the web.
As always, thank you very much for all your knowledgeable contributions.
Dear All,
For a power supply being tested to meet Canadian requirements we were asked
to conduct a 40 A for 4 minutes earthing test because the power supply was
tested for oveload/shorts on a branch circuit of 20 A. Does this value of 40
A and time of 4 mins. make sense? I believe the
Yes Yes.
Please call me at 403-615-4672
Regards,
Regan Arndt
Sr. Engineer
TUV Rheinland of North America, Inc.
Colgan, Chris
Hello Chris,
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Colgan, Chris wrote:
Has anyone had any experience of switching NRTLs? Is it possible to do so
without incurring huge expense for retesting products ie is there a NRTL
that would accept test reports/certificates of another?
Although there exist private
Chris,
There may be some hungry NRTLs or some that have existing cooperative
agreements with another NRTL, but would you take complete responsibility and
liability to sell a product under your name that another company designed and
tested by taking their word that everything was OK with the
Has anyone had any experience of switching NRTLs? Is it possible to do so
without incurring huge expense for retesting products ie is there a NRTL
that would accept test reports/certificates of another? I would be grateful
to hear from anyone that has attempted or done this you can't all
17 matches
Mail list logo
