README.TXT
Description: Binary data
One more thing I forgot to mention, that may be useful. Pegasus (the
email program I use at home) has a very nice Selective Download
feature, that allows you to review what is on your server BEFORE
downloading it. Thus, you can screen and delete (at the source!!) all
suspicious messages or
For those interested in how to track down something like this,
take a look at the header information. You'l see a bunch of
Received: xx lines. In this case there were 6 of them
in the email I received. To start with the first received,
go to the *bottom* one. That's where this post
For what it's worth, an absolutely excellent virus purge program is
F-Prot, available from Frisk Software International at:
http://www.f-prot.com/f-prot/download/
The DOS version is FREE and supported with very frequent (almost weekly)
virus signature file updates. It runs just fine in a DOS
William Hurst took over these responsibilities.
To contact these people the FCC website has a contact us section were you
can access a phone directory and find the numbers you need.
http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/findpeople.pl
Best Regards
Lothar Schmidt
Technical Manager EMC/Radio
BQB
CETECOM
No, Art has not retired. He will retire by the end of 2003 I think. He
recently moved his office back to the lab in Columbia. His email address is
unchanged.
BJ
-Original Message-
From: Gary McInturff [mailto:gary.mcintu...@worldwidepackets.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 11:50
You can also search the existing rules interpretation database on the FCC
web site
https://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/oet/index_ie.html
Under miscellaneous, click on rule interpretations.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Reginald Henry [mailto:rhe...@vicon-cctv.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April
Didn't Art Wall retired a year or so ago.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: am...@westin-emission.no [mailto:am...@westin-emission.no]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:14 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: SV: FCC Contact
You can also make contact with Mr. Art Wall on
All of which makes one wonder why one would ever use IE as a mail
reader! Rather like using a wrench as a hammer; sure, it can be made to
work ...but why?
Personally, I use Outlook at work (only because I have to). But at home,
I use Pegasus which I feel is the best email program going, and it
Agreed -- I've received this virus about 50 times in the last few days, but
each time the system (local server) quarantines it..
Mike Hopkins
Thermo KeyTek
-Original Message-
From: Robert Wilson [mailto:robert_wil...@tirsys.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 11:47 AM
To:
I deleted the file email immediately, but our IS group is asking what the
file name was. Can anyone remember what it was, so I can pass it on to
them.
Thanks
Doug Beckwith
Naftali Shani nsh...@catena.com@majordomo.ieee.org on 04/24/2002 12:06:22
PM
Please respond to Naftali Shani
Some thoughts. Assuming that this was a virus, the warning could be helpful
to some. While I agree with Robert comments in part, in fact a lot of the
viruses that exploit weaknesses in Microsoft Outlook use the sender's
address book. So you WILL get viruses from people you know or correspond
Robert,
You do not have to open the attachment on this one at all if you have
IE! Just preview or open the message.
During virus outbreaks, like this one, I use a great webmail reader
mail2web.com to preview my mail before downloading it.
Doug
Robert Wilson wrote:
In spite of the attachment
Hi Chris and the Gang,
It was probably a particularly nasty one called W32/Klez.h@MM which I
have received through other channels several times lately. It is bad
enough that if you actually get infected (McAfee will prevent this if
your DAT files are reasonably new) you have to go into DOS and
Hi Chris, Bill, and all other subscribers:
A message with the subject:
A very nice game
was sent to the IEEE (emc-pstc) for posting by
our listserver.
The original message contained a virus known
as KLEZ.G.
The IEEE computer detected the virus.
This virus was stripped from the
Here is the number for OET EMC division, I've never found them to be much
help, but then again, I've never been much help either.
Electromagnetic Compatibility Division
Electromagnetic Compatibility Division 202-418-2475
Chief
Robert M. Bromery
Deputy Chief
For MRAs, contact Art Wall (located at D.C.) at (202)-418-2442.
For OET services, contact Richard Fabina at (301)-362-3021.
For EMC (eg. Pt15, etc.), contact Tom Phillips at (301) - 362 - 3044.
For Radio Approval (eg.Pt 101, etc.), contact Frank Coperich at 301-362-3023.
I have found they are
Bonjour de Montreal,
Just a few comment about BSMI, MRAs and testing.
The APEC TEL MRA was sign by the DGT in Taiwan, thus allowing foreign
testing lab to the EMC on telecom equipment only. The extension, in USA, of
this MRA to Information Technology Equipment was negotiated separately by
the
Just as a matter of curiosity, regarding the trailing boilerplate on
your message, what could possibly be accomplished by forwarding an
incorrectly delivered email back to the sender? The recipient will still
have the original message. Sounds like someone isn't too clear on the
concepts of
You can also make contact with Mr. Art Wall on e-mail: aw...@fcc.gov
He gave us some advice a year ago regarding FCC interpretation.
Amund
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]På vegne av John Juhasz
Sendt: 24. april
If I'm not wrong, this is the KLEZ virus (Win32.Klez.I@mm).
Regards,
Naftali Shani, Catena Networks (www.catena.com)
307 Legget Drive, Kanata, Ontario, Canada K2K 3C8
613.599.6430/866.2CATENA (X.8277); C 295.7042; F 599.0445
E-mail: nsh...@catena.com
-Original Message-
From: Chris
In spite of the attachment having been removed by the system, it was
pretty darned obvious what this must have been. It always amazes me that
people are foolish (stupid?) enough to open attachments to obviously
suspicious emails like this one, that are from people they don't know,
and subjects
Try sending an email to oeti...@fcc.gov. I've received responses to
questions within 1 day.
Jim Hulbert
Pitney Bowes
rehel...@mmm.com
http://www.pseinc.com/faq.htm
Try this site !
RH
-Original Message-
From: rehel...@mmm.com [mailto:rehel...@mmm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:12 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: FCC Contact
Can anyone provide me with phone and/or name contacts for FCC rules
Bob,
You can go to the FCC.gov website and find the phone numbers and the
departments they work in. I would suggest Tom Phillips in OET, but I have been
known to dial randomly and get the answers I need. Although they sometimes seem
surprised and ask me where I got their particular
Was just at a hotel with the replacement circular fluorescent lamps
directly above (2 feet) the hotel provided radio (less cheesy than most).
Turning on the light completely destroyed the signal. AM and FM and all
channels. Turn it off and the radio was nice a clear. Wanted to steal
I may be out of date and I don't have a number at hand, but Art Wall comes
to mind. You can find all the appropriate personnel in the back of ITEM.
on 4/24/02 8:12 AM, rehel...@mmm.com at rehel...@mmm.com wrote:
Can anyone provide me with phone and/or name contacts for FCC rules
Bill,
Do we know which virus it was?
Regards
-Original Message-
From: Bill Ellingford [SMTP:bill.ellingf...@motion-media.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 12:37 PM
To: 'jmw'; emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject:RE: A very nice game
Importance: High
URGENT
Please be
Contact the FCC's OET (Office of Engineering and Technology).
http://www.fcc.gov/oet/contact/
GE Interlogix
John A. Juhasz
Fiber Options Div.
Bohemia, NY
-Original Message-
From: rehel...@mmm.com [mailto:rehel...@mmm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:12 AM
To:
Can anyone provide me with phone and/or name contacts for FCC rules
interpretation (Parts 15, 18, and 68)?
Bob Heller
3M Product Safety, 76-1-01
St. Paul, MN 55107-1208
Tel: 651- 778-6336
Fax: 651-778-6252
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society
Dear All,
Some fluorescent lamps (the bulb) are marked with CE and others are not.
What European Directives and standards should fluorescent lamps have to
comply with?
This e-mail message may contain privileged or confidential information. If
you are not the intended recipient, you may not
URGENT
Please be aware that the above E-mail to the EMC group contained a virus.
Fortunately our system removed it from the message.
Bill Ellingford
-Original Message-
From: jmw [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: 24 April 2002 22:59
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: A very nice game
There will be a Northeast Product Safety Society meeting today, April
24, at EMC Corporation's Customer Briefing Center in Hopkinton, MA. A
social hour with light refreshments will begin at 7:00 PM and the
technical meeting will start at 7:30 PM. James Norton, CEO of EMD
Optima, will be
Amund
I don't think of a green wire as RF ground. What are Y caps DOING? They
are a return path for RF current that could otherwise get onto the mains
and cause interference. How does RF current get onto the power conductors?
Unbalanced switching noise? Yes, mostly. Capacitive coupling? Some.
Hi Amund:
Being a safety guy and not an emc guy... (disclaimer)
Ground connections is usually nice to have when dealing with EMC. But what
about EMC and a class 2 (double insulation) power supply (shall comply with
MIL-STD-461E) . I'm thinking on, what to do with the regularly
35 matches
Mail list logo
