See 7.2.4.1 of the standard ( my bold text):
Rationale: Ungrounded equipment, or*ungrounded part(s) of equipment,*
cannot discharge
itself similarly to class I mains-supplied equipment. If the charge is
not removed before the
next ESD pulse is applied, it is possible that the EUT or part(s) of
Hi
I had a similar situation. We ended using the alternative test method, with
just extending the time between discharges. As per IEC 61000-42 Section 7.4.2.1:
Therefore as an alternative, the following options may be used:
• the time interval between successive discharges shall be extended to
Oh Boy Elliott,
you’ll get a few answers here, lol.
My 10 cents is that when you are not discharging each time you are adding more
and more charge to the isolated control, that eventually will snap over At that
point you are discharging quite a significantly higher level of chart than an
Anyone know where to find vector files (dxf, ai, pdf, et cetera) for the PSE
mark for Japan? Or dimension requirements?
Thanks,
[cid:image001.png@01D5F87E.2E1AE560]
Mark Stultz
10175 Philipp Parkway
Senior Mechanical Development Engineer
Streetsboro, OH 44241
CMSE® - Certified Machinery
Hi Everybody,
We're having some disagreements regarding the 61000-4-2 standard. In the
section "ungrounded equipment", it states that ungrounded equipment or part(s)
of equipment shall have the charge removed in between ESD pulses in order to
not over-test.
We have a product that only fails
Hi
For those running EMI Labs was wondering what procedures you use to move
Test Racks in and out of EMI Chambers,
We use custom made ramps, which we put over the door threshold, aligning
the front wheels on the ramp, then pushing the unit up and over into the
chamber.
Items which seem
6 matches
Mail list logo