It’s an old one but it still makes me smile……. Regarding the difference
between wisdom and knowledge…….
Knowledge is knowing that a tomato is a fruit.
Wisdom is knowing not to put it in a fruit salad.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
From: emc-p...@ieee.org
access point antenna.
I hope this helps a little.
Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
From: Pawson, James [mailto:james.paw...@echostar.com]
Sent: 10 January 2012 16:13
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Radiated Emissions Testing of Intentional
Hello,
I'm not aware of any requirement for it to be on the DoC. Just the
equipment, the packaging and the user manual.
I find this labelling guidance document very useful:
http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/rtte/files/guidance/guidance_en.pdf
Michael.
Michael
form of communication taking place.
Thanks, Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
-Original Message-
From: Brian Oconnell [mailto:oconne...@tamuracorp.com]
Sent: 25 January 2012 19:03
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] FCC requirements for Inductive
This makes me realise how boring my reply was.
I'm sorry.
I'll try harder next time.
I don't want to be one of those guys in the red shirt who only turns up for
one episode and you know he's going to get killed.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
From
word. e-bay
:-)
Do we all buy our products new, from the original supplier?
Just to stir the pot,
Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
-Original Message-
From: Richard Nute [mailto:ri...@ieee.org]
Sent: 28 January 2012 20:39
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
transmitter in with it)
As for multi-radio equipment.. It's likely that the GPS will be on during
tests of other features, so you may be able to save time and effort by
monitoring/exercising both.
I hope this helps,
Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
From
equipment which also has a
satellite transmitter included. In such a case, you might consider using
something like EN 300 441 and EN 401 489-19.
I hope that makes sense?
Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
From: Steve O'Steen [mailto:steve.ost...@acstestlab.com
for their opinion.
Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
From: Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com]
Sent: 28 February 2012 16:08
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] RTTE compliance test reports
I notice that some compliance reports of RTTE are reviewed
and administrative changes.
I'm sure I'll get corrected on some of my political terminology details here
but I hope the general idea makes sense.
Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
From: Amund Westin [mailto:am...@westin-emission.no]
Sent: 28 February 2012 17:11
interpretation and skill set of actual testing.
.Yes. You could look at the capability of the lab, how they calibrate
their equipment, chat to them about the standards and the staff, visit their
lab, etc.
Michael
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
From: Scott Xe
with their NB number on
it. If the device has a problem in the real world and a regulator contacts
the Notified Body, the Notified Body can say sure, we gave our opinion, we
said no.
Some people like the freedom of a DoC system. Some don't like the
responsibility.
Michael.
Michael Derby
paid a lot of money for the license and the other has not. Who do you think
will get to stay switched on? :-)
Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
-Original Message-
From: Macy [mailto:m...@basicisp.net]
Sent: 08 March 2012 17:15
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
exactly John, hence the 2-part FCC statement on the label of the
unlicensed device. :-)
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
-Original Message-
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: 08 March 2012 17:52
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES
Directive does not apply. You don't apply them both.
Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
-Original Message-
From: Charlie Blackham [mailto:char...@sulisconsultants.com]
Sent: 12 March 2012 20:58
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Identifying Apparatus
standards from the EMC OJ and the Safety OJ
to demonstrate compliance with articles 3.1b and 3.1a of the RTTE Directive
but that doesn't mean you're applying the EMC or Safety Directives.
Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
From: Charlie Blackham [mailto:char
, Canada and Europe, I see very real examples of how poor
compliance rates do lead to a tightening in the requirements.
So, you could also consider it an investment.
Just a thought. :-)
Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
-Original Message-
From: Richard Nute
surveillance authority could ask questions.
Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
From: Charlie Blackham [mailto:char...@sulisconsultants.com]
Sent: 06 June 2012 09:19
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Two Notified Body numbers on a product
Amund
not written in
the rules yet but it is an acceptable standard to use.
http://transition.fcc.gov/oet/ea/eameasurements.html
Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
From: itl-emc user group [mailto:itl...@itl.co.il]
Sent: 15 July 2012 04:48
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
hope this helps,
Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
From: Robert Heller [mailto:rehel...@mmm.com]
Sent: 23 July 2012 12:07
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] SAR standards
Are SAR standards (EN 62209-1 for example) harmonized to any Directive
Renewed annually.
I don't recall if a dog license is cheaper if you have a black and white
dog.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
-Original Message-
From: Kunde, Brian [mailto:brian_ku...@lecotc.com]
Sent: 08 August 2012 21:27
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re
sponsors to worry about.
Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
From: ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
[mailto:g.grem...@cetest.nl]
Sent: 08 August 2012 19:58
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] FW: [PSES] EU sets EMC limits for London Olympics
I confess to a hint of British irony in my e-mail. J
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
From: Peter Tarver [mailto:ptar...@enphaseenergy.com]
Sent: 09 August 2012 23:29
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] FW: [PSES] EU sets EMC limits for London Olympics
Commission post this page on ‘Class 1’
devices.
http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/rtte/files/rtte_subclass_july2012_en.
pdf
You can see sub-class 22 is for WLAN devices.
In June, it said “2400-2454 MHz” Now, from July, it says “2400-2483.5
MHz”
I hope this helps,
Michael.
Michael
Thanks Ed,
I was thinking back to my days of living in the USA. Maybe I should have
said relatively neutral.J
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
From: Ed Price [mailto:edpr...@cox.net]
Sent: 10 August 2012 13:57
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES
applicable to
your application.
Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
-Original Message-
From: Charlie Blackham [mailto:char...@sulisconsultants.com]
Sent: 12 October 2012 13:19
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] CE+CE ...
Amund
There's guidance
the components in the
power supply were all cheaper imitations of the components he had instructed
the manufacturer to use.
D'oh.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
-Original Message-
From: Kunde, Brian [mailto:brian_ku...@lecotc.com]
Sent: 30 October 2012 20:42
To: EMC
sudden new requirement.
EN 300 328 V1.8.1 makes it even more clear and removes the requirement for
clarifications in the OJ.
As a final comment, yes, there are manufacturers involved in the ETSI group
for EN 300 328. :-)
Thanks, Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
.
Honestly, I don't actually hear these voices in my head.
Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
From: Charlie Blackham [mailto:char...@sulisconsultants.com]
Sent: 29 November 2012 08:31
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] EN 300 328 V1.8.1 new
I blame too much time between the helmholz coils!!!
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
From: Nick Williams [mailto:nick.willi...@conformance.co.uk]
Sent: 29 November 2012 21:32
To: Michael Derby
Cc: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] EN 300 328 V1.8.1 new
If he had a kind of high pitched, squeaky voice, yes.
I do recall I did get a headache every time I put the surge generator
through the coils but perhaps that's to be expected.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
-Original Message-
From: don_borow...@selinc.com
believe that the proposed new RTTE Directive text should officially allow
this approach, I hope.
Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
From: Charlie Blackham [mailto:char...@sulisconsultants.com]
Sent: 03 December 2012 08:25
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject
.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
From: Derek Walton [mailto:lfresea...@aol.com]
Sent: 06 January 2013 17:14
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] iPhone 5 TxRx frequencies on 4g
HI folks, can anyone tell me what transmit and receive frequencies my iPhone
5 uses here
.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
-Original Message-
From: John Cotman [mailto:john.cot...@conformance.co.uk]
Sent: 14 January 2013 16:37
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] One DoC per manufactured Unit?!
The Toy Safety Directive already has the picture requirement
Hello,
You cannot get confidentiality or even short term confidentiality on a test
report. You can't keep the results private, sorry.
David is correct in his summary below.
Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
From: itl-emc user group [mailto:itl
.
And yes, this is a volatile topic on this e-mail forum. J
Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
From: Mcburney, Ian [mailto:ian.mcbur...@dmh-global.com]
Sent: 05 February 2013 09:50
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Retesting to latest standards
with the standard that a device outside the scope of
A12 does not present a safety risk.
As ever, the Directives are more important than the standards.
Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
-Original Message-
From: Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com]
Sent: 06 February 2013
15.109 measurements (and
Part 15.209) tests must be performed on a listed test site.
https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/TestFirmSearch.cfm
I hope this helps?
Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
From: Niels Hougaard [mailto:n...@bolls.dk]
Sent: 14
for Europe on RTTE equipment.
It's all DoC, to the latest requirements.
So, I think you are right. The lab and manufacturer seem like they are
wrong.
Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
From: Carl Newton [mailto:emcl...@gmail.com]
Sent: 15 July 2013 17:02
, after all.
If that fails, I have the ETSI group chairman's e-mail address, if you want
it. J
Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
From: Mark Tucker [mailto:mtuc...@murata.com]
Sent: 07 August 2013 18:01
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES
slipped.
Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
From: itl-emc user group [mailto:itl...@itl.co.il]
Sent: 22 August 2013 05:18
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Lists Of Harmonised Standards
Hi,
Does anyone have any leads as to when a new list
to television receivers.
Being a luxury yacht, it had many television receivers.
I confess, I was surprised.
Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
From: Thomas Cokenias [mailto:t...@tncokenias.org]
Sent: 22 August 2013 21:43
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
From: Grasso, Charles [mailto:charles.gra...@echostar.com]
Sent: 30 August 2013 17:20
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Using existing WiFi FCC data for new FCCID - Yes or No?
Hello,
Given: A product that has a front
. There is an FCC rule change
proposal in place, to insert the 2009 version and remove the 2003 version.
So, in summary, ANSI C63.4-2009 is ok for FCC and Industry Canada.
Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
From: Ian McBurney [mailto:ian.mcbur...@allen-heath.com]
Sent
the initial review. So, I think the shopping around
idea is no different now, to how it was before.
I hope this helps,
Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
From: FW Miller [mailto:f_w_mil...@yahoo.com]
Sent: 02 October 2013 19:32
To: EMC-PSTC
If they make microwaves to look more like the carry cases you take a cat to the
vet in, then it becomes almost impossible to get the cat to go in there.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
From: IBM Ken [mailto:ibm...@gmail.com]
Sent: 10 January 2014 16:30
To: EMC-PSTC
this helps.
Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
From: Curtis Mc Namara [mailto:mcnam...@umn.edu]
Sent: 30 January 2014 23:48
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] FCC draft comments on WiFi operation in channels 12 and 13
FCC Draft KDB 594280 Software
the
general emissions limits of 15.209 and certify to Part 15C.
Thanks, Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
From: mel soliven [mailto:mel_soli...@yahoo.com]
Sent: 07 March 2014 03:11
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] RFID - USA
Dear Experts
class JBP.
Thanks, Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
From: Niels Hougaard [mailto:n...@bolls.dk]
Sent: 14 March 2014 14:05
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Concerning FCC classification of digital devices
Dear list members,
Being
That's correct Cortland. If the USB is only used for charging (not data
transfer), then it does not count as a 'peripheral' and therefore
Verification as Digital Device can be used.
Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
From: CR [mailto:k...@earthlink.net]
Sent
.
. Responsible parties.
. Market surveillance.
. Process for Class 2 devices.
..to name but a few.
Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
From: Jim Hulbert [mailto:jim.hulb...@pb.com]
Sent: 23 May 2014 18:24
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject
, in particular, of the non-compliance and of any
corrective measures taken.
Thanks, Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
-Original Message-
From: Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com]
Sent: 06 June 2014 16:20
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] New EU Directives
of the EMC and Safety Directives, with a
few noteworthy exceptions. (For example, there is no minimum voltage limit
for radio equipment, so all battery powered equipment would need a safety
assessment)
Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
-Original Message-
From: John
OJ for RED?
11:59pm on 11th June 2016 ?
J
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
From: Charlie Blackham [mailto:char...@sulisconsultants.com]
Sent: 08 June 2014 20:32
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] List of Harmonised standards for RED
David
.
Look which one is number 1 on the list… J ….
http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/rtte/files/rtte-subclass2_en.pdf
Thanks, Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
From: Dave Heald [mailto:emcp...@gmail.com]
Sent: 31 July 2014 18:38
To: EMC-PSTC
.
There are plenty of things which must be assessed by manufacturers
independently before they make it into harmonised standards.
So, maybe it was unsafe?
Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
-Original Message-
From: Crane, Lauren [mailto:lauren.cr...@kla-tencor.com]
Sent: 31
12 June 2016 to prepare and we must be
able to use the RED by 12 June 2016.
The RTTE Directive will be repealed on 12 June 2016.
But yes, as Lauren says, under the RED the Alert Symbol will no longer be part
of the labelling requirements.
Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory
/official/word/ECCDec0408.doc
Also, it's listed as a Class 2 device on the EU website:
http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/rtte/files/rtte-subclass2_en.pdf
Scroll down to page 2 and it confirms why it is Class 2. Indoor use only.
Thanks, Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory
and EMC, so
the user should not be plugging a device into a mains charger if they have not
yet seen the CE Mark. J
Thanks, Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
From: Mike Violette [mailto:mi...@acbcert.com]
Sent: 01 August 2014 19:42
To: EMC-PSTC
HI Paul,
Good point…. Disclaimer, I only had my RTTE hat on. J
Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
From: Paul Lovell (plovell) [mailto:plov...@cisco.com]
Sent: 04 August 2014 11:20
To: Michael Derby; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [PSES] E
if there are mixed messages about
whether it is just for customs and MSAs, or if it's for the user also?
Not disagreeing, just thinking.
Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
-Original Message-
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: 04 August 2014 11:14
Hello all,
As we've been talking about the RTTE Class 1 and 2 devices, the lists have
been updated:
http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/rtte/documents/index_en.htm#h2-5
Michael.
Michael Derby
Regulatory Engineer
ACB Europe
Certification Resource for the Wireless
.
Michael Derby
Senior Regulatory Engineer
Director
ACB Europe
From: Michael Loerzer [mailto:loerzer_mob...@globalnorm.de]
Sent: 05 September 2014 15:58
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Applicable SAR standard for a VoIP GSM Gateway
Hi,
regarding health and safety
is that the Notified Body must be able to turn up and check.
At least, that's what I was told.
Michael.
Michael Derby
Senior Regulatory Engineer
Director
ACB Europe
From: Nick Williams [mailto:nick.willi...@conformance.co.uk]
Sent: 11 September 2014 23:03
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
a practical point of view, it is also impossible.
Michael.
Michael Derby
Senior Regulatory Engineer
Director
ACB Europe
From: Anthony Thomson [mailto:ton...@europe.com]
Sent: 29 October 2014 15:00
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] New Radio Equipment Directive
of them don’t seem to know how to test.
Michael.
Michael Derby
Senior Regulatory Engineer
Director
ACB Europe
From: Anthony Thomson [mailto:ton...@europe.com]
Sent: 30 October 2014 09:16
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] New Radio Equipment Directive (RED) - please
Hi John,
What would the disclaimer be in this case?
Disclaimer: We are not a Notified Body to the RE Directive and this
document is legally invalid as a Notified Body certificate ?
It doesn't sound like a very useful certificate.
Michael.
Michael Derby
Senior Regulatory Engineer
Yes, ETSI are working on new standards and updates to old standards.
As you say, they do have a timeline goal to work towards!
Michael.
Michael Derby
Senior Regulatory Engineer
Director
ACB Europe
From: rpick...@rpqconsulting.com [mailto:rpick...@rpqconsulting.com]
Sent: 30
engineer
who is happy to stay in the test lab.
Michael.
Michael Derby
Senior Regulatory Engineer
Director
ACB Europe
-Original Message-
From: Brian Oconnell [mailto:oconne...@tamuracorp.com]
Sent: 17 December 2014 21:36
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Brick power
appear to be really busy.
So, there’s hope yet.
Michael.
Michael Derby
Senior Regulatory Engineer
Director
ACB Europe
From: Anthony Thomson [mailto:ton...@europe.com]
Sent: 18 December 2014 10:35
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Brick power supplies and test
…..”
If they fix that, I’ll have to start talking about SAR levels and then I won’t
get invited to dinner any more.
Michael.
Michael Derby
Senior Regulatory Engineer
Director
ACB Europe
From: Doug Powell [mailto:doug...@gmail.com]
Sent: 03 February 2015 15:22
To: EMC-PSTC
Ha ha ha.
You know you’re in a boring job when you pretend to be a drug dealer to enhance
your social acceptability. J
Michael Derby
Senior Regulatory Engineer
Director
ACB Europe
From: Kunde, Brian [mailto:brian_ku...@lecotc.com]
Sent: 04 February 2015 13:38
To: EMC-PSTC
themselves confidence.
but of course the type of companies who discuss this with me might not
represent a true demographic of all manufacturers out there. :-)
Michael.
Michael Derby
Senior Regulatory Engineer
Director
ACB Europe
-Original Message-
From: CR [mailto:k
Hello all,
I don't know if this helps and maybe it's not the full answer, but I remember
the conversation regarding colour photographs on the DoC when we were
progressing the early drafts of the new Radio Equipment Directive.
There is an attempt to harmonise the administrative requirements
Hello Amund,
This is a general reply about installing CE Marked radio modules into host
products..
The important thing to remember is that there no certification process under
the RTTE Directive and also no modular approvals.
Anyone installing the module into a product becomes responsible
.
-Original Message-
From: Crane, Lauren [mailto:lauren.cr...@kla-tencor.com]
Sent: 12 May 2015 00:11
To: Michael Derby; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [PSES] Integrating radio COSTs into other equipment
Michael,
Do you think this applies to the case for installing a finished product
reasons, which justifies re-testing on the final product?
Amund
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: Michael Derby [mailto:micha...@acbcert.com]
Sendt: 11. mai 2015 13:10
Til: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Emne: Re: [PSES] Integrating radio COSTs into other equipment
Hello Amund
This isn't a particularly helpful contribution, but when I use my microwave
(used correctly, with the door closed), my Bluetooth speaker completely
stops working and any WiFi activity grinds to a halt.
I try to keep the kids away from the microwave when it's in use, as much as
I can.
Michael.
Hello Amund,
I don't know if your question relates to the RED timing conversation below
(which I think has been fully answered by Nick); or if this is a new
question relating to the general requirements of the RTTE Directive (and
perhaps the RED in the future).
So, I will assume it's a
Hello,
As others have said, I do not think the Directive needs to be listed in the
test reports. You test to standards and the manufacturer deals with the
Directive.
Probably, the person saw the incorrect Directive reference and flagged it
up. If there had not been any reference to any
Hello Amund,
Yes, I would say that you do need to list the module's radio standards on the
DoC of the final product.
After all, the person putting the final product on the market is effectively
using those standards to state compliance of their new radio product.
Those standards are used to
Hello Dieter,
In addition to the responses you already received (which I like), I would
ask you to check that your host ITE product is really 'ancillary equipment',
as defined in EN 301 489-1.
I think that as others have pointed out, your host product will most likely
continue to need to
Hi Scott,
Annex IV of 2014/53/EC is similar to Annex V of 1999/5/EC.
It’s an alternative compliance route, not necessarily a test report issue.
Michael.
From: Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com]
Sent: 24 August 2015 14:59
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] New
Hello Amund,
The FCC do perform market surveillance on certified products and every TCB
must also perform market surveillance on 5% of the devices they have
certified.
The TCB must report the findings of their surveillance to the FCC each year.
I think the results are not openly reported, but I
Hi Ian,
You are almost correct. The FCC's logo is only for devices which have been
authorised under the DoC process.
Devices which have verification or certification, do not show the FCC logo.
Of course, if there is a mixture of authorisation routes and one of them is
DoC, then the
Hello Brian,
As the various EU Directives become recast and/or re-written, they will all
include the requirement to issue one DoC for the whole product, for all the
applicable Directives.
As you mentioned, you could have one for RoHS, EMD and Safety.
It is acceptable to have a dossier of
Hello,
Yes, I think taking the comments to GEL 210 would be on the agenda for this
working idea.
ETSI too, of course.
The history of it is this
Some members had noticed a lot of EMC test reports which simply don't explain
how the device was tested, monitored or assessed for compliance.
Thanks Charlie.
I think you make a good point.
The fact is that for the EMC Directive; using a harmonised standard on a
presently valid OJ gives you presumption of conformity.
Of course need to do a risk assessment that nothing has been missed out by your
device being ahead of the
it with minimal
testing effort and no additional radio authorisation.
If the Bluetooth is not a module, or it is a module which is not certified,
then it will need to be tested and certified.
Please let me know if this has given you any answers, or just more
questions!
Michael.
Michael Derby
Hello Amund,
I agree that you should be CE Marking these devices, as they are placed on the
market for normal use.
If there is any flexibility to be found, then maybe it is in your application
of the Directive.
For example, the typical way to comply with the Directive would be to fully
apply
erent forms (e.g. colour, solid/hollow) as long
as it remains visible, legible and respects its proportions."
Thanks,
Michael.
Michael Derby
Senior Regulatory Engineer
Director
ACB Europe
Certification Resource for the Wireless Industry
Web: www.acbcert
Hi Grace,
I think this is a mistake. I think there is not a maximum allowed duty cycle
of 20 dB.
I think this mistake comes from the fact that there is a peak limit which
exists at 20 dB higher than the average limit.
and therefore do require
Japanese certification too.
Thanks,
Michael.
From: Michael Derby [mailto:micha...@acbcert.com]
Sent: 05 May 2016 15:06
To: 'Kunde, Brian' <brian_ku...@lecotc.com>; 'EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG'
<EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Subject: RE: [PSES] NFC Near Field C
Hi Brian,
Which geographical region are you interested in?
USA. FCC Certification to FCC 15.225
Test lab must presently be listed with FCC, but will require a recognised
accreditation very soon.
Unlicensed transmitter, but certification is required.
Canada. ISED Certification to
I guess you would get a similar answer from Volkswagen these days. :-)
Michael.
-Original Message-
From: Brian O'Connell [mailto:oconne...@tamuracorp.com]
Sent: 03 August 2016 18:10
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] SAFETTY FEATURES controlled by SOFTWARE
Dear
Hello,
You are correct that you can continue to use the EMCD and LVD until the end
of the RED transition period.
(See this useful document:
http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/11983/attachments/1/translations/en/r
enditions/native )
It's true that if the standards are not listed in
(depending on the understanding of the person you’re talking to);
but it should be very easy to justify that those are the correct standards to
use.
Thanks,
Michael.
From: Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com]
Sent: 15 August 2016 18:06
To: Michael Derby <micha...@acbcert.com>; EM
and BT/Wifi enabled units, it can use the HSs in
RED/LVD/EMC of OJEU without the use of NB as per the interpretation of below.
Thanks,
Scott
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 6:00 AM, Michael Derby <micha...@acbcert.com
<mailto:micha...@acbcert.com> > wrote:
Hi Nick,
You ar
Meanwhile; for Article 3.2 of the RED, remember that the new standard is EN
303 345.
http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_en/303300_303399/303345/01.01.01_20/en_3033
45v010101a.pdf
And for the Bluetooth, of course it would be EN 300 328 V2.1.1.
Thanks,
Michael.
From: Larry K.
Hi Stephen,
One thing to remember is that “must not be co-located” really just means “must
not be co-located without some additional effort”
For example, co-locating two modules and then calculating the new combined RF
Exposure MPE value to verify that the product still meets the
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
