[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I reduced all:
Default_valacity =1.
Max_velacity =2.0
Default_acceleration = 2.0
Max_acceleration =3.0
I reduced most of them by 2-3 times and graph looks good. I will post it
in 20 minutes.
I am interesting why my drive can not output more voltage?
power
Hi
i should be able to go up to +10V to -10V. Am i right?
is 1.0 output units means i use only 1.0V out of 10V that system can output?
does pic www.conceptmachinery.com/Sh12.jpg looks ok?
This looks better, now your Xoutput is not saturating and the error also
looks trapezoidal. This is a
Aram,
2 PID loops are ok to use, just a bit more difficult to tune.
I use Yaskawa motors/drives with the m5i20 7i33.
I have to tune the yaskawa drive and motor first with yaskawa software and
get them running smoothly.
Usually I tune them fairly 'soft', that is not very stiff (in velocity
mode).
I think the easiest way to do this is for a point to point network or
even a network with a hub is to use raw ethernet packets. An ethernet
packet has a payload of up to 1500 bytes. That should be large enough
for most things we would want.
On top of the payload we have around 20 bytes of
We've had previous discussions about using ethernet for real time control.
In theory, this is NOT difficult stuff. I'll bet I could get something
going in a week or three.
In practice, though, it is a PITA. That's because you would need a real
time driver for each of the zillion or so different
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
i should be able to go up to +10V to -10V. Am i right?
is 1.0 output units means i use only 1.0V out of 10V that system can output?
I still don't know what interface you are using, but that MAY be
correct. It would certainly limit your speed if the drive was
Is it possible to use EMC with multi-core processors? I see that by
default the kernel is compiled to only support one processor but what
would happen if SMP support was compiled in? Would RTAI choke?
As multi-core processors become more prevalent, would it be practical to
dedicate one core to
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 05:46:48PM +, Leslie Newell wrote:
Is it possible to use EMC with multi-core processors? I see that by
default the kernel is compiled to only support one processor but what
would happen if SMP support was compiled in? Would RTAI choke?
As multi-core processors
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 05:46:48PM +, Leslie Newell wrote:
Is it possible to use EMC with multi-core processors? I see that by
default the kernel is compiled to only support one processor but what
would happen if SMP support was compiled in? Would RTAI choke?
As multi-core processors
On Monday 01 December 2008 18:57:50 Chris Radek wrote:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 05:46:48PM +, Leslie Newell wrote:
Is it possible to use EMC with multi-core processors? I see that by
default the kernel is compiled to only support one processor but what
would happen if SMP support was
On Monday 01 December 2008 18:57:50 Chris Radek wrote:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 05:46:48PM +, Leslie Newell wrote:
Is it possible to use EMC with multi-core processors? I see that by
default the kernel is compiled to only support one processor but what
would happen if SMP support was
when booting the linux kernel you use isolcpus
(http://www.linuxtopia.org/online_books/linux_kernel/kernel_configuration/re46.html)
Note: isolcpus is supposed to get deprecated in favour of another
mechanism.
Here's an example using cpusets:
Michael Buesch wrote:
[snip]
Nice. What are the basic config settings you have to do?
How to bind rtai to a CPU?
RTAPI already does this - it uses the highest numbered active CPU for RT
tasks when compiled for SMP.
You need to use a kernel command-line parameter, isolcpus. This is a
list
This is very interesting. I only started thinking about it because I set
up my house machine using the EMC live cd and noticed only one core was
being used. As I don't actually need RTAI on this machine I simply
switched to the generic kernel which has SMP.
Les
Alex Joni wrote:
I think the
Doug Goff wrote:
Andy,
The motor tool Gene was (probably) trying to recall is the Proxxon IB/E
Professional Rotary Tool. I'm using one on my smallest machine, and it
does a great job. Very nicely machined nose allows mounting, the motor
is fairly quiet (compared to the Porter-Cable
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Tuesday 25 November 2008, Doug Goff wrote:
Andy,
The motor tool Gene was (probably) trying to recall is the Proxxon IB/E
Professional Rotary Tool. I'm using one on my smallest machine, and it
does a great job. Very nicely machined nose allows mounting, the motor
is
On Monday 01 December 2008, Andrew Ayre wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Tuesday 25 November 2008, Doug Goff wrote:
Andy,
The motor tool Gene was (probably) trying to recall is the Proxxon IB/E
Professional Rotary Tool. I'm using one on my smallest machine, and it
does a great job. Very nicely
17 matches
Mail list logo
