Hi,
is it possible to write a g-code program setting, for example, a linear motion
distance with a halui parameter? My goal is to use a pyvcp scale to set the
position I want to move to: G0 X[pyvcp.dimension]
Thank you
Luigi
Dear Steve
Try removing the O sub/endsub lines and loading the files
individually. That should get you a line number where the error occurs
(I hope).
The files were actually converted into subfiles from standalone files. The
standalone files work without any error and do not show O
1 The medical grade RFI filters have a much smaller capacitance between
line and ground, and usually have more series inductance. It can be
tough to find medical style line filters with high current ratings.
Plus, they're expensive...
2. I recently spoke with an engineer from North Shore Safety
To generate lots of debug messages:
In your.ini file section [RS274NGC] add the line
LOG_LEVEL = 999
Then the file emc_log will get a log containing the interpreter activity
regarding o-words, subroutines, etc. You probably don't want this
enabled when you are doing something
2009/10/5 Matt Shaver m...@mattshaver.com:
1 The medical grade RFI filters have a much smaller capacitance between
line and ground, and usually have more series inductance. It can be
tough to find medical style line filters with high current ratings.
Plus, they're expensive...
Annoyingly,
Hi all,
(For Peter) I think I found the main problem with tuning the X and Y axes. I
used the registry values of the old system to set the initial parameters for
EMC, and goofed on interpreting the accel parameters. In the Galil world,
these are in encoder counts / sec^2 rather than units per
Eric H. Johnson wrote:
My question now is about angular axes. While the X and Y axes have on the
order of 5000 counts per inch, the rotational axis only has 51.1 counts per
degree (18400 per revolution) If I use 18400 for my INPUT_SCALE, I can tune
the axis rather easily. Of course in this
On Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:42 -0400, Eric H. Johnson
ejohn...@camalytics.com wrote:
Hi all,
(For Peter) I think I found the main problem with tuning the X and Y
axes. I
used the registry values of the old system to set the initial parameters
for
EMC, and goofed on interpreting the accel
I finally got the chance to try Chris' threading patch:
http://timeguy.com/cradek-files/emc/0001-Improve-initial-threading-synchronization.patch
Before : http://imagebin.ca/view/XLxWqSm.html
After : http://imagebin.ca/view/RYa7Qqpm.html
Watching it cycle after cycle it was very inconsistent
I have found a work-around, but wondering if anyone can point me to a
better solution.
I'm building a second CNC machine (another EMCO F1 with steppers),
using the same type of Sound Logic breakout board I used for my first
machine. However, I didn't use the charge-pump circuit on that first
John Kasunich wrote:
Write down the PID gains that work when the scale is 18400. Then, since
you are dividing the scale by 360 to get 51.1, you should be able to
also
divide the gains by 360, and the resulting PID results should be
identical.
Take the old gains, divide by 360, and try them
11 matches
Mail list logo
