I have the W axis working.
http://www.chudov.com/projects/Bridgeport-Series-II-Interact-2-CNC-Mill/34-Adding-Servo-Control-to-Knee/
When commanded, the W axis moves up and down, roughly as instructed,
according to my G0 W... commands.
It is not super precise or well tuned, yet, but really not so
Chris, and Stuart, it was EXACTLY as you said!
Thanks!
i
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Chris Radek wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 09:52:15PM -0600, Igor Chudov wrote:
> > I set AXES=5. Should I say 9? I only have 5 axes.
>
> http://linuxcnc.org/docs/2.4/html/config_ini_config.html#sub:[TR
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 09:52:15PM -0600, Igor Chudov wrote:
> I set AXES=5. Should I say 9? I only have 5 axes.
http://linuxcnc.org/docs/2.4/html/config_ini_config.html#sub:[TRAJ]-section
--
Free Software Download: Index
I think you need to set it to nine. Try it and see.
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Igor Chudov wrote:
> I set AXES=5. Should I say 9? I only have 5 axes.
>
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 9:48 PM, Stuart Stevenson
> wrote:
>
> > look at your .ini file
> >
> > in the TRAJ section does the AXES = 5 o
I set AXES=5. Should I say 9? I only have 5 axes.
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 9:48 PM, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
> look at your .ini file
>
> in the TRAJ section does the AXES = 5 or AXES = 9?
> the W axis is the ninth axis
>
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 9:12 PM, Igor Chudov wrote:
>
> > I am adding 5th
look at your .ini file
in the TRAJ section does the AXES = 5 or AXES = 9?
the W axis is the ninth axis
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 9:12 PM, Igor Chudov wrote:
> I am adding 5th axis (W) to my mill's configuration and I get a message
> "waiting for s. axis" repeated several times.
>
> What does it m
I am adding 5th axis (W) to my mill's configuration and I get a message
"waiting for s. axis" repeated several times.
What does it mean?
thanks
--
Free Software Download: Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 6:42 PM, gene heskett wrote:
> Greets all;
>
> I made up a wooden jig to mount the dull blades from my Delta JT360 6"
> jointer into the tiltable vice on may milling machines table. The tilted
> it to 44 degrees, one less than the OEM grind. Then mounted a dremel
> diamo
> Sercos 3 was one example of the use of ethernet for real time control.
>
> Another example is ethernet i/p. Again it uses standard ethernet
technology
> and allows the use of switches between the host and slave. It all comes
> down to timing. AB claims they do +/- 100 uS without modified hardwar
On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 11:06 +, andy pugh wrote:
> http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Denford-quick-change-milling-machine-spindle-30-int-/110655017690?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_3&hash=item19c38d92da#ht_499wt_1159
>
> I think this might be slightly miss-described.
>
> I think it is a QC30 spindle (without the be
On Monday, February 28, 2011 09:52:59 am fi did opine:
> On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 08:48 -0800, Kirk Wallace wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 15:46 +0200, fi wrote:
> > ... snip
> >
> > > Is hal_parport.c the proper file to modify for 16 bit I/O over PATA
> > > ports ?
> > > Are other files to be mod
On Monday, February 28, 2011 09:27:16 am andy pugh did opine:
> On 27 February 2011 23:42, gene heskett wrote:
> > I made up a wooden jig to mount the dull blades from my Delta JT360 6"
> > jointer into the tiltable vice on may milling machines table.
>
> Have you considered making your own blad
Mark Wendt wrote:
> On 02/28/2011 08:56 AM, Moses McKnight wrote:
>
>>> [snip]
>> Sounds like standard ethernet frames. I would imagine they would use
>> standard frames because ethernet hardware is expecting that.
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethernet_frame
>>
>> Moses
>>
> Almost
On Monday, February 28, 2011 09:07:45 am Glenn Edwards did opine:
> Gene,
>
> I think it likely the blades you have were not hardened throughout from
> the factory. Only the cutting edge was induction hardened and you
> probably removed the heat-treated edge with the first or second
> re-sharpen
On 02/28/2011 08:56 AM, Moses McKnight wrote:
>> Looking again at the Sercos3 implementation, each "host" requires at
>> least a two-port network interace. That's how they implement either the
>> "Line", "Ring" or other network topology. Each "host" has to process
>> the data and then pass it on
Sercos 3 was one example of the use of ethernet for real time control.
Another example is ethernet i/p. Again it uses standard ethernet technology and
allows the use of switches between the host and slave. It all comes down to
timing. AB claims they do +/- 100 uS without modified hardware. With
On 02/28/2011 07:37 AM, Mark Wendt wrote:
> On 02/28/2011 08:19 AM, Dave wrote:
>> Siemens DriveCliq works the same way. Everything is point to point.
>> No external hubs or switches.
>> I think the controller I was using recently had 6 or 8 Ethernet jacks.
>> The drive module had 3, one for the
On 02/28/2011 08:19 AM, Dave wrote:
> Siemens DriveCliq works the same way. Everything is point to point.
> No external hubs or switches.
> I think the controller I was using recently had 6 or 8 Ethernet jacks.
> The drive module had 3, one for the connection to the controller and two
> for encod
Siemens DriveCliq works the same way. Everything is point to point.
No external hubs or switches.
I think the controller I was using recently had 6 or 8 Ethernet jacks.
The drive module had 3, one for the connection to the controller and two
for encoder connections.
I think the line module (
On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 08:48 -0800, Kirk Wallace wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 15:46 +0200, fi wrote:
> ... snip
> > Is hal_parport.c the proper file to modify for 16 bit I/O over PATA
> > ports ?
> > Are other files to be modified ?
> ... snip
>
> >From my study of the parallel port drivers, 90%
On 28 February 2011 10:19, Mark Wendt wrote:
> It would be nice if there were some other port available that would
> work in real time, and deliver the throughput and versatility we need as
> good or better than the parallel port.
There is a realtime USB extension for RTAI:
https://www.rt
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Denford-quick-change-milling-machine-spindle-30-int-/110655017690?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_3&hash=item19c38d92da#ht_499wt_1159
I think this might be slightly miss-described.
I think it is a QC30 spindle (without the bearings)
--
atp
"Torque wrenches are for the obedience of foo
On Monday 28 February 2011 10:31:32 Erik Christiansen wrote:
> And our RTAI environment probably wouldn't help much toward RT sending
> of UDP packest, because we'd still be using the linux kernel (non-RT) to
> push them out.
Thats exactly my question: how to send/receive udp packets
on a (additi
On 02/27/2011 04:22 PM, Peter Blodow wrote:
>
>> Peter,
>>
>> I work on a daily basis with Ethernet as a system and network
>> administrator.
>>
>> We're talking about a Real Time Ethernet, with a dedicated master and
>> slave network interface, which should preclude any worry of collisions
>> on a
On 02/27/2011 03:00 PM, Frank Tkalcevic wrote:
>> Hmmm, wonder if that board could be programmed to be a real time
>> ethernet slave?
>
> The board doesn't have any of the Ethernet hardware - RJ45 connector or PHY
> chip. The MAC they speak of is built into the chip.
>
> Here's a better source of
On 02/27/2011 11:42 AM, Jean-Paul Moniz wrote:
> Ethernet medium can be in realtime take a look at sercos3 for example.
>
> It uses standard ethernet hardware.
> Sent on the TELUS Mobility network with BlackBerry
According to the wiki, you can't use standard ethernet hardware:
" SERCOS III is de
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 09:12:50AM +0100, Joachim Franek wrote:
> Have also a look to the bottom of the
> http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/emcinfo.pl?AVR
> page: it is about AVR32 for motor control
> (with eclipse based ide for linux).
Seeing that they are also supported by the gnu toolchain, and the UC3
On 27 February 2011 23:42, gene heskett wrote:
> I made up a wooden jig to mount the dull blades from my Delta JT360 6"
> jointer into the tiltable vice on may milling machines table.
Have you considered making your own blades? Either from HSS (parting
tool blanks?) or possibly even from gauge p
Gene,
I think it likely the blades you have were not hardened throughout from the
factory. Only the cutting edge was induction hardened and you probably
removed the heat-treated edge with the first or second re-sharpening.
However, to see what you have, why don't you put the back-side of the blad
On Sunday 27 February 2011 14:13:12 Erik Christiansen wrote:
>
> If the community decided to go with this, I'd buy a couple, and arc up
> the gnu toolchain for this target, just for the fun of playing with ARM.
> These chips have one quadrature encoder input. At 100 MHz, and with
> hardware counte
30 matches
Mail list logo
