Re: [Emc-users] 7i92 bitfile programming problem

2018-07-13 Thread Sebastian Kuzminsky
On 13/07/2018 12:04, Les Newell wrote: > I'm running a fairly recent Buildbot release and I built the latest Git > version and still got the same error. The version of mesaflash available in the linuxcnc.org debian archive, 3.3.0~pre0+dfsg-0, should work fine with the 7i92. Note that mesaflash

Re: [Emc-users] 7i92 bitfile programming problem

2018-07-13 Thread Peter C. Wallace
On Fri, 13 Jul 2018, Les Newell wrote: Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 12:31:31 +0100 From: Les Newell Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)" To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)" Subject: Re: [Emc-users] 7i92 bitfile programming problem Looks like a must have messed

Re: [Emc-users] 7i92 bitfile programming problem

2018-07-13 Thread Les Newell
Looks like a must have messed up a path somewhere. Rebuilt mesaflash and it now works. Les On 13/07/2018 12:04, Les Newell wrote: Hi Peter, I think that means you have a old version of mesaflash I'm running a fairly recent Buildbot release and I built the latest Git version and still got

Re: [Emc-users] 7i92 bitfile programming problem

2018-07-13 Thread Les Newell
Hi Peter, I think that means you have a old version of mesaflash I'm running a fairly recent Buildbot release and I built the latest Git version and still got the same error. Les -- Check out the vibrant tech

Re: [Emc-users] 7i92 bitfile programming problem

2018-07-12 Thread Peter C. Wallace
On Thu, 12 Jul 2018, Les Newell wrote: Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 16:21:42 +0100 From: Les Newell Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)" To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Emc-users] 7i92 bitfile programming problem I am trying to program a 7i92 using Mesaflas

[Emc-users] 7i92 bitfile programming problem

2018-07-12 Thread Les Newell
I am trying to program a 7i92 using Mesaflash and I am having a problem: mesaflash --device 7i92 --write 7i92_G540x2D.bit Error: wrong bitfile destination device: 6slx9tqg144, should be xc6slx9 Looking at the board it does appear to have an xc6slx9. Has the 7i92 been redesigned recently? If