Re: [Emc-users] I am STILL not getting G2/G3

2020-11-02 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 02 November 2020 14:58:59 Craig Hodne via Emc-users wrote: > > Here is the code I have adapted from counterbore.py's output to try > > and be position independent: Single stepped from MDI input > > = > > (counterbore sub) > > o100 SUB > > (SHCS Counterbore, Diameter

Re: [Emc-users] I am STILL not getting G2/G3

2020-11-02 Thread Craig Hodne via Emc-users
Here is the code I have adapted from counterbore.py's output to try and be position independent: Single stepped from MDI input = (counterbore sub) o100 SUB (SHCS Counterbore, Diameter = 0.3900, Depth = 0.1750 ) (Number of Cuts 7, Depth of Cut 0.0250) (Tool Diameter =

Re: [Emc-users] I am STILL not getting G2/G3

2020-11-02 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 02 November 2020 09:59:59 Stuart Stevenson wrote: > Gene, > > The first thing I would try is as follows: > > change from > G3 X0. Y-0.0700 Z-0.0250 J0.0700 (dies here) > G3 X0. Y-0.0700 Z-0.0250 J0.0700 > G3 X0. Y-0.0700 Z-0.0250 J0.0700 > G3 X0. Y-0.0700 Z-0.0250

Re: [Emc-users] I am STILL not getting G2/G3

2020-11-02 Thread Stuart Stevenson
Gene, The first thing I would try is as follows: change from G3 X0. Y-0.0700 Z-0.0250 J0.0700 (dies here) G3 X0. Y-0.0700 Z-0.0250 J0.0700 G3 X0. Y-0.0700 Z-0.0250 J0.0700 G3 X0. Y-0.0700 Z-0.0250 J0.0700 G3 X0. Y-0.0700 Z-0.0250 J0.0700 G3 X0. Y-0.0700 Z-0.0250 J0.0700

Re: [Emc-users] I am STILL not getting G2/G3

2020-11-01 Thread Gene Heskett
On Sunday 01 November 2020 05:59:13 andy pugh wrote: > On Sat, 31 Oct 2020 at 20:48, Gene Heskett wrote: > > Yes Jon, r1 does not equal r2. Gawd I wish that error window was > > copy/pastable. The code straight out of counterbore.py has exactly > > the same error. > > G90 / G91 and G90.1 /

Re: [Emc-users] I am STILL not getting G2/G3

2020-11-01 Thread andy pugh
On Sat, 31 Oct 2020 at 20:48, Gene Heskett wrote: > Yes Jon, r1 does not equal r2. Gawd I wish that error window was > copy/pastable. The code straight out of counterbore.py has exactly the > same error. G90 / G91 and G90.1 / G91.1 need to match the assumptions of the G-code. -- atp "A

Re: [Emc-users] I am STILL not getting G2/G3

2020-10-31 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 31 October 2020 20:25:07 Jon Elson wrote: > On 10/31/2020 03:46 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > > Yes Jon, r1 does not equal r2. Gawd I wish that error window was > > copy/pastable. The code straight out of counterbore.py has exactly > > the same error. Is there a newer version of it?

Re: [Emc-users] I am STILL not getting G2/G3

2020-10-31 Thread Jon Elson
On 10/31/2020 03:46 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: Yes Jon, r1 does not equal r2. Gawd I wish that error window was copy/pastable. The code straight out of counterbore.py has exactly the same error. Is there a newer version of it? Where? I never use IJ arcs, but only R arcs. Saves me a LOT of

Re: [Emc-users] I am STILL not getting G2/G3

2020-10-31 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 31 October 2020 16:46:16 Gene Heskett wrote: > On Saturday 31 October 2020 15:53:50 Jon Elson wrote: > > On 10/31/2020 12:01 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > G0 Z4.2500 (clear fixtures etc) (works) > > > G0 X0. Y-0.0700 (pre-position to start a G3 move) (works) > > > (spiral down in

Re: [Emc-users] I am STILL not getting G2/G3

2020-10-31 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 31 October 2020 15:53:50 Jon Elson wrote: > On 10/31/2020 12:01 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > > G0 Z4.2500 (clear fixtures etc) (works) > > G0 X0. Y-0.0700 (pre-position to start a G3 move) (works) > > (spiral down in relative, so just step z down in additive mode) > > G91 (relative

Re: [Emc-users] I am STILL not getting G2/G3

2020-10-31 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 31 October 2020 15:20:29 marcus.bow...@visible.eclipse.co.uk wrote: > Gene, > > I am probably barking up the wrong tree, but: > > As a general method, I would position the controlled point where I > wanted the routine to begin. > (Say at X40 Y25 Z10) > Then I would call the

Re: [Emc-users] I am STILL not getting G2/G3

2020-10-31 Thread Jon Elson
On 10/31/2020 12:01 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: G0 Z4.2500 (clear fixtures etc) (works) G0 X0. Y-0.0700 (pre-position to start a G3 move) (works) (spiral down in relative, so just step z down in additive mode) G91 (relative distance mode) G3 X0. Y-0.0700 Z-0.0250 J0.0700 (dies here) OK, you

Re: [Emc-users] I am STILL not getting G2/G3

2020-10-31 Thread marcus . bowman
Gene, I am probably barking up the wrong tree, but: As a general method, I would position the controlled point where I wanted the routine to begin. (Say at X40 Y25 Z10) Then I would call the subroutine. Inside the subroutine, I would use G92 to set the current position to zero (or some other

[Emc-users] I am STILL not getting G2/G3

2020-10-31 Thread Gene Heskett
Greetings all; Here is the code I have adapted from counterbore.py's output to try and be position independent: Single stepped from MDI input = (counterbore sub) o100 SUB (SHCS Counterbore, Diameter = 0.3900, Depth = 0.1750 ) (Number of Cuts 7, Depth of Cut 0.0250) (Tool