Stephen Dubovsky wrote:
15 inches/second-squared? No surprise. I usually use between 3 and 5
on my machines.
I have a Supermax YCM30 (a bridgeport 2J clone) w/ servos that I just tuned
to 30in/s^2 no problem. Don't have the file infront of me but I think I
have my 4'x4'
With an open-loop system, there is no measurement available other than
your ears or a dial
indicator. As long as it doesn't lose steps, you are OK. When first
starting to machine
actual work, watch out for missed steps.
Thanks Jon! That's what I was afraid you'd say ... The default
On 30 August 2012 05:37, Jon Elson el...@pico-systems.com wrote:
For final sanity check, make it run a tapping cycle in air with a tap in the
spindle, and put your fingernail lightly in the grooves of the tap. If
the whole
operation works right, your nail won't move up or down.
I would
On Thursday 30 August 2012 11:30:20 Matthew Herd did opine:
With an open-loop system, there is no measurement available other than
your ears or a dial
indicator. As long as it doesn't lose steps, you are OK. When first
starting to machine
actual work, watch out for missed steps.
Matthew Herd wrote:
With an open-loop system, there is no measurement available other than
your ears or a dial
indicator. As long as it doesn't lose steps, you are OK. When first
starting to machine
actual work, watch out for missed steps.
Thanks Jon! That's what I was afraid
15 inches/second-squared? No surprise. I usually use between 3 and 5
on my machines.
I have a Supermax YCM30 (a bridgeport 2J clone) w/ servos that I just tuned
to 30in/s^2 no problem. Don't have the file infront of me but I think I
have my 4'x4' stepper gantry mill at ~100in/s^2. 3-5
I've gotten my Bridgeport BOSS 5 mill running fairly well. I'm using the Pico
Systems USC board and LinuxCNC 2.4.6.
First off, I observed that the default acceleration values in the Pico-Systems
sample configs were too high for reliable operation of the axes on the BOSS.
Particularly, the Z
Matthew Herd wrote:
I've gotten my Bridgeport BOSS 5 mill running fairly well. I'm using the
Pico Systems USC board and LinuxCNC 2.4.6.
First off, I observed that the default acceleration values in the
Pico-Systems sample configs were too high for reliable operation of the axes
on the
