On Saturday, March 03, 2012 01:26:16 AM Cathrine Hribar did opine:
> On Fri, 2 Mar 2012 13:47:40 -0500
>
> gene heskett wrote:
> > On Friday, March 02, 2012 01:24:42 PM Cathrine Hribar did opine:
> >> On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 21:23:11 -0500
> >>
> >> gene heskett wrote:
> >> > Rather than inline
On Fri, 2 Mar 2012 13:47:40 -0500
gene heskett wrote:
> On Friday, March 02, 2012 01:24:42 PM Cathrine Hribar did opine:
>
>> On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 21:23:11 -0500
>>
>> gene heskett wrote:
>> > Rather than inline the carriage drive screw, with will leave the motor
>> > hanging out quite a wa
On Friday, March 02, 2012 01:24:42 PM Cathrine Hribar did opine:
> On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 21:23:11 -0500
>
> gene heskett wrote:
> > Rather than inline the carriage drive screw, with will leave the motor
> > hanging out quite a ways on the left end of this lathe, I could save
> > about 3" if I mou
On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 21:23:11 -0500
gene heskett wrote:
> Rather than inline the carriage drive screw, with will leave the motor
> hanging out quite a ways on the left end of this lathe, I could save about
> 3" if I mounted the motor to the bed on another piece of 1/4" alu plate,
> such that
Rather than inline the carriage drive screw, with will leave the motor
hanging out quite a ways on the left end of this lathe, I could save about
3" if I mounted the motor to the bed on another piece of 1/4" alu plate,
such that a gear on the motor shaft would engage a gear on the lead screw.
I
