Re: [Emc-users] Prempt RT --> RTAI, Xenomai, delay

2016-02-02 Thread Nicklas Karlsson
> > Preempt RT do not manage priorities properly for interrupts while RTAI and > > Xenomai do. It is rather simple, execution time to service an interupt > > every > > now and then will delay real time tasks with as much time as they take to > > execute. Then there are SMI which will interrupt

Re: [Emc-users] Prempt RT --> RTAI, Xenomai, delay

2016-02-02 Thread Peter C. Wallace
On Tue, 2 Feb 2016, Nicklas Karlsson wrote: > Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 22:27:59 +0100 > From: Nicklas Karlsson > Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)" > > To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)" > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Prempt RT --> RTAI, X

Re: [Emc-users] Prempt RT --> RTAI, Xenomai, delay

2016-02-02 Thread Ralph Stirling
icklas Karlsson [nicklas.karlsso...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2016 1:27 PM To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Prempt RT --> RTAI, Xenomai, delay > ... > That's because NOBODY (manufacturers or distributors) wants to futz with > testing motherboar

Re: [Emc-users] Prempt RT --> RTAI, Xenomai, delay

2016-02-02 Thread Nicklas Karlsson
> ... > That's because NOBODY (manufacturers or distributors) wants to futz with > testing motherboard latencies, problems with their obsolescence, IO > boards, controllers, USB issues, etc. All that is a big concern to > anybody who wants to see LinuxCNC as part of their business. Preempt RT d