It just means that for specific moves that involve ABC axes, the planner
will fall back to parabolic blends (i.e. 2.6-style blending). This means
that continuous contouring using the A axis will be slower than the
equivalent 3-axis path, if the program has a lot of short segments. In your
case, the
2015-11-11 14:51 GMT+02:00 Robert Ellenberg :
> Currently the TP does not support arc blends between rotary axis moves
Rob, are you saying that this code would not be supported?
G01X1.279Z14.031
X1.544Z13.921
X1.720Z13.834
X1.897Z13.735
X2.073Z13.622
X2.250Z13.496
X2.426Z13.352
X2.470Z13.313
X2.4
Actually this is simple single axis move. Ok, so, the receipt is to
change it to Y (possible this time) and use digital out M6... commands?
Are there any plans for TP to support 6 or all 9 axes?
11/11/2015 02:51 PM, Robert Ellenberg rašė:
> Hi Marius,
>
> The problem is not the digital IO, but t
Hi Marius,
The problem is not the digital IO, but the A axis. Currently the TP does
not support arc blends between rotary axis moves, so it falls back to
parabolic blends (which can be slower for short segments).
Rob
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015, 7:31 AM Marius Alksnys
wrote:
> I want to control two d
I want to control two digital outputs while in motion without slow-down.
Now I use G1 with A axis. Neither Arc Blend TP settings in ini nor M62,
63, 64, 65 seems to help - I get a slowdown at the switching point.
--
