> On 25 mei 2014, at 06:48, Charles Steinkuehler
> wrote:
>
>> On 5/22/2014 10:19 AM, Bas de Bruijn wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 22 mei 2014, at 16:48, Ralph Stirling
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Bas,
>>>
>>> I think you are attempting to reinvent the "Multiwire" pcb process.
>>> Wikipedia has a paragraph a
On 5/22/2014 10:19 AM, Bas de Bruijn wrote:
>
>
>> On 22 mei 2014, at 16:48, Ralph Stirling
>> wrote:
>>
>> Bas,
>>
>> I think you are attempting to reinvent the "Multiwire" pcb process.
>> Wikipedia has a paragraph about Multiwire on their printed circuit
>> board page. The challenge will be
_
> From: Bas de Bruijn [bdebru...@luminize.nl]
> Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 7:26 AM
> To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Wapped Rotary motion
>
>> On 22 mei 2014, at 16:09, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 2
jn [bdebru...@luminize.nl]
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 7:26 AM
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Wapped Rotary motion
> On 22 mei 2014, at 16:09, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 7:09 AM, Bas de Bruijn wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>>
> On 22 mei 2014, at 16:09, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 7:09 AM, Bas de Bruijn wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>> On 22 mei 2014, at 13:34, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
>>>
>>> You should try + and -. They should determine which direction you travel.
>>> The position command tells the m
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 7:09 AM, Bas de Bruijn wrote:
>
>
> > On 22 mei 2014, at 13:34, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
> >
> > You should try + and -. They should determine which direction you travel.
> > The position command tells the machine where to stop. 1 degree will
> always
> > be in the same pla
> On 22 mei 2014, at 14:20, andy pugh wrote:
>
>> On 22 May 2014 13:09, Bas de Bruijn wrote:
>> The angle is output of a component
>
> In that case you might want to use the "orient" component as an intermediary.
Reading orient.9 I have to input the number of revolutions already done.
Dividi
On 22 May 2014 13:09, Bas de Bruijn wrote:
> The angle is output of a component
In that case you might want to use the "orient" component as an intermediary.
--
atp
If you can't fix it, you don't own it.
http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto
--
> On 22 mei 2014, at 13:34, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
>
> You should try + and -. They should determine which direction you travel.
> The position command tells the machine where to stop. 1 degree will always
> be in the same place.
I only have absolute positions between from 0 up to and includi
You should try + and -. They should determine which direction you travel.
The position command tells the machine where to stop. 1 degree will always
be in the same place.
On May 22, 2014 5:43 AM, "Bas de Bruijn" wrote:
>
>
> > On 21 mei 2014, at 23:42, Bas de Bruijn wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>> On 2
> On 21 mei 2014, at 23:42, Bas de Bruijn wrote:
>
>
>
>>> On 21 May 2014, at 23:37, Chris Radek wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 11:21:54PM +0200, Bas de Bruijn wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I'd like to have a table running in wrapped rotary motion. I've
>>> added WRAPPED=1 in the ini file,
>>
> On 21 May 2014, at 23:37, Chris Radek wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 11:21:54PM +0200, Bas de Bruijn wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I'd like to have a table running in wrapped rotary motion. I've
>> added WRAPPED=1 in the ini file,
>
> You spelled it wrong:
>
> http://www.linuxcnc.org/docs/html/conf
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 11:21:54PM +0200, Bas de Bruijn wrote:
> Hi,
> I'd like to have a table running in wrapped rotary motion. I've
> added WRAPPED=1 in the ini file,
You spelled it wrong:
http://www.linuxcnc.org/docs/html/config/ini_config.html#sub:AXIS-section
-
Hi,
I'd like to have a table running in wrapped rotary motion. I've added WRAPPED=1
in the ini file, bur when going from +180 to -180 or the table rotates back,
instead of forward. Is there something else I must do to have the table
rotating over the shortest angle?
Thanks,
Bas
-
14 matches
Mail list logo
