On Tuesday 17 December 2013 06:17:55 Gregg Eshelman did opine:
On 12/16/2013 12:05 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
Greetings all;
clip
Shorter, even only a 4 tap setup could be of help and might be worth
exploring just for SG, concept checking to see if I know what I'm
going on about. ;-)
On 12/17/2013 12:23 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
I wonder if this is anything like that?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2SozZ7af3wg
No, no resemblance to my idea, and TBT that driver would be dangerous
unless its feedback does go into LCNC so LCNC knows it is not where LCNC
told it to be. Cute
On Tuesday 17 December 2013 07:26:20 Bertho Stultiens did opine:
On 12/17/2013 12:23 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
I wonder if this is anything like that?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2SozZ7af3wg
No, no resemblance to my idea, and TBT that driver would be dangerous
unless its feedback
Greetings all;
This jerk you are discussing seems like the ideal place to have a module
similar in nature to one of the limit functions, and which would subject a
step change in speed to what I would call in a broadcast waveform analyzing
situation as a sine-squared function. This could be
On 16 December 2013 19:05, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
This jerk you are discussing seems like the ideal place to have a module
similar in nature to one of the limit functions, and which would subject a
step change in speed to what I would call in a broadcast waveform analyzing
On Mon, 2013-12-16 at 19:25 +, andy pugh wrote:
On 16 December 2013 19:05, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
This jerk you are discussing seems like the ideal place to have a module
similar in nature to one of the limit functions, and which would subject a
step change in speed
On 12/16/2013 01:25 PM, andy pugh wrote:
The equation becomes cubic in time, and somewhat harder to
solve. Things are (naturally) harder still in 9-space.
I don't think jerk needs to be computed in 9-space. It
really only needs to apply to each individual axis. But,
maybe you mean that it
On Mon, 2013-12-16 at 22:22 -0600, Jon Elson wrote:
On 12/16/2013 01:25 PM, andy pugh wrote:
The equation becomes cubic in time, and somewhat harder to
solve. Things are (naturally) harder still in 9-space.
I don't think jerk needs to be computed in 9-space. It
really only needs to apply
On Tuesday 17 December 2013 00:18:09 dave did opine:
On Mon, 2013-12-16 at 19:25 +, andy pugh wrote:
On 16 December 2013 19:05, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
This jerk you are discussing seems like the ideal place to have a
module similar in nature to one of the limit
On 12/16/2013 12:05 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
Greetings all;
clip
Shorter, even only a 4 tap setup could be of help and might be worth
exploring just for SG, concept checking to see if I know what I'm going on
about. ;-) It might even be worth doing a digital sine squared search on
google for
10 matches
Mail list logo
