On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 02:41, andrew beck wrote:
> We stopped it and then changed a wear offset and it ignored the toolchange
> and tried to machine with t3 instead of changing to t4.
Was this with run-from-line? (You say that you stopped it)
Which line did you run from?
--
atp
"A motorcycle
No we pushed cycle stop changed a offset by 0.01mm waited 2 minutes then
restarted whole program from beginning.
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023, 21:59 andy pugh, wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 02:41, andrew beck
> wrote:
>
> > We stopped it and then changed a wear offset and it ignored the
> toolchange
A shop vac should be able to run continuously with no hose attached without
overheating. However what would overheat one fairly quickly, would be running
with a restriction in the exhaust. Perhaps you're muffler is adding too much
backpressure?
Todd Zuercher
P. Graham Dunn Inc.
630 Henry
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 10:33, andrew beck wrote:
>
> No we pushed cycle stop changed a offset by 0.01mm waited 2 minutes then
> restarted whole program from beginning.
Could your observations be explained by the toolchanger position not
being what the system thought it was?
What sort of
> From: Todd Zuercher [mailto:to...@pgrahamdunn.com]
>
> A shop vac should be able to run continuously with no hose attached without
> overheating. However what would overheat one fairly quickly, would be
> running with a restriction in the exhaust. Perhaps you're muffler is adding
> too much
4HP=2.9828 kW
I(A) = 1 kW × 1,000 / 120 V
I(A) = 1,000 W / 120
I(A) = 8.33 A
So, generating 1 kW of power at 120 volts will draw 8.33 amps of current.
After looking at this, I may never run my Shop Vac again.
Scott
On Wednesday, October 11, 2023 at 08:07:11 PM CDT, gene heskett
wrote:
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 19:19, andrew beck wrote:
> And also the fact that Linux CNC was showing t3 when t3 was the one loaded.
>
> Even though the code had gone past the t4 command
If you can find a recipe to recreate the issue then perhaps there is a
way to investigate what's going on.
--
Hey andy
I just have a pocket sensor home sensor and classic ladder counter.
Plus carousel clamped and unclamped sensors etc.
But I don't think that was the problem.
If that was the case I would expect the offsets to be incorrect.
Eg t4 would be using t3 offsets and try machine in wrong
Yep I'll keep digging and reply back here later
On Fri, 13 Oct 2023, 08:38 andy pugh, wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 19:19, andrew beck
> wrote:
>
> > And also the fact that Linux CNC was showing t3 when t3 was the one
> loaded.
> >
> > Even though the code had gone past the t4 command
>
> If
