On 03/03/2016 09:21 PM, dan...@austin.rr.com wrote:
> No joy. I have the RT-preempt (have a 7i92 ethernet control card,
> does not handle the modbus though).
>
> uname -a Linux localhost 3.2.0-4-rt-686-pae #1 SMP PREEMPT RT Debian
> 3.2.73-2+deb7u2 i686 GNU/Linux
Great, this helps illuminate
No joy. I have the RT-preempt (have a 7i92 ethernet control card, does not
handle the modbus though).
uname -a
Linux localhost 3.2.0-4-rt-686-pae #1 SMP PREEMPT RT Debian 3.2.73-2+deb7u2
i686 GNU/Linux
Sudo was required for some of these. Made errors without.
cd src
./configure
I have removed mt3 by putting a bolt in the chuck and then putting
something forked on the bolt above the head and using that to bang on.
Best thing I've found is a "Wonder Bar" and then put a block under the
other end to make it level. If the bolt slides out of the chuck jaws
you may have to
On Thursday 03 March 2016 13:59:59 Ed wrote:
> On 03/03/2016 11:14 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> > On 3 March 2016 at 16:12, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >>> Not normally. You remove Jacobs tapers with a pair of forked
> >>> wedges:
> >>>
I once had to deal with a chuck that someone had glued the arbor in with
red locktite. (And we didn't know that it was locktited.) First tried to use
the wedges, no luck. Eventually we wrote off the arbor and cross-drilled
it so we could put a dowel pin in there and have something more robust
On 03/03/2016 11:14 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> On 3 March 2016 at 16:12, Gene Heskett wrote:
>>> Not normally. You remove Jacobs tapers with a pair of forked wedges:
>>> http://www.amazon.com/Wedge-Sets-Set-No-WEDGE/dp/B0067BSG9S/ref=sr_1_1
>>> ?ie=UTF8=1457019896=8-1=jacobs+wedge
On 03/03/2016 10:04 AM, dan...@austin.rr.com wrote:
> Forgot to mention- yes there was a "Submakefile" in the wj200_vfd directory.
> We moved that to the x200_vfd directory and blanket-replaced wj200 to x200 in
> that as well.
>
> It compiles ok. Like I say, starting Linuxcnc, it exits and the
On Thursday 03 March 2016 12:08:40 R.L. Wurdack wrote:
> Or in the case of my Ming Dynasty machine they just fall out at
> inopportune times...
>
Usually when it can do the most damage, BTDT, Murphy is alive and well
despite my attempts to collect a bounty for the guy.
>
> - Original
On Thursday 03 March 2016 12:14:03 andy pugh wrote:
> On 3 March 2016 at 16:12, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> Not normally. You remove Jacobs tapers with a pair of forked
> >> wedges:
> >> http://www.amazon.com/Wedge-Sets-Set-No-WEDGE/dp/B0067BSG9S/ref=sr_
> >>1_1
On 3 March 2016 at 16:12, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> Not normally. You remove Jacobs tapers with a pair of forked wedges:
>> http://www.amazon.com/Wedge-Sets-Set-No-WEDGE/dp/B0067BSG9S/ref=sr_1_1
>>?ie=UTF8=1457019896=8-1=jacobs+wedge
>
> Luverly, just luverly...
Especially so
Or in the case of my Ming Dynasty machine they just fall out at inopportune
times...
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Layne" To: "Enhanced Machine
Controller (EMC)"
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 8:47 AM
Subject: Re:
Forgot to mention- yes there was a "Submakefile" in the wj200_vfd directory.
We moved that to the x200_vfd directory and blanket-replaced wj200 to x200 in
that as well.
It compiles ok. Like I say, starting Linuxcnc, it exits and the error info it
shows says "execv x200_vfd: no such file or
On 03/03/2016 10:45 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> You remove Jacobs tapers with a pair of forked wedges
I thought the recommended method of removing a Jacobs chuck was to use
them to machine with an end mill.
--
Site24x7
On Thursday 03 March 2016 10:45:15 andy pugh wrote:
> On 3 March 2016 at 15:31, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > I am assuming a drift punch
> > can reach the inner face of the spud to bounce them out?
>
> Not normally. You remove Jacobs tapers with a pair of forked wedges:
>
On 03/02/2016 09:22 PM, dan...@austin.rr.com wrote:
> OK, modified the .comp file with the new reg numbers and blanket replaced
> "wj200" to "x200".
>
> first tried:
> cd /home/atxhacker/linuxcnc-2.7.4/src
> sudo ./configure
> sudo make
> sudo make setuid
That looks nearly right, but you
On Thursday 03 March 2016 09:06:40 John Alexander Stewart wrote:
> Gene;
>
> Smart move.
>
> My ER collet chucks reside on my mills, and almost never get removed.
> (boring head, cutoff saw, but do not have a drill chuck that fits the
> spindles)
>
> I do have some smaller drill chucks
On 3 March 2016 at 15:31, Gene Heskett wrote:
> I am assuming a drift punch
> can reach the inner face of the spud to bounce them out?
Not normally. You remove Jacobs tapers with a pair of forked wedges:
On Thursday 03 March 2016 10:29:22 Dave Cole wrote:
> On 3/2/2016 11:39 PM, Chris Albertson wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Dave Cole
wrote:
> >> Spur gear transmissions are inherently noisy. I think that is why
> >> helical gears exist. However they
On Thursday 03 March 2016 10:27:35 sam sokolik wrote:
> The z axis on the k has the z axis servo mounted on the base of the
> machine. The power is transferred to the spinning ball nut through a
> linear ball spline and atleast 3 sets of zero backlash gear sets.
> (including right angle set)
>
>
On 3/2/2016 11:39 PM, Chris Albertson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Dave Cole wrote:
>
>> Spur gear transmissions are inherently noisy. I think that is why
>> helical gears exist. However they typically have higher load
>> capacity for the same width of
The z axis on the k has the z axis servo mounted on the base of the
machine. The power is transferred to the spinning ball nut through a
linear ball spline and atleast 3 sets of zero backlash gear sets.
(including right angle set)
Gene;
Smart move.
My ER collet chucks reside on my mills, and almost never get removed.
(boring head, cutoff saw, but do not have a drill chuck that fits the
spindles)
I do have some smaller drill chucks (expensive, good) that I have on
parallel shanks, trimmed so that they will go into an ER
Spur gear transmissions are inherently noisy. I think that is why
helical gears exist. However they typically have higher load
capacity for the same width of gear (as I recall).
I have a camshaft drive in a hotrod engine that was sold as a noisy gear
drive and it is. It sounds like a
On 3 March 2016 at 10:00, Gregg Eshelman wrote:
> Herringbone gear - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"Herringbone" isn't a term used in the industry, as far as I know.
They tend to call them "double helical"
A double helical gear needs one element to have axial float to
You can pin a pair of opposite angled helical gears together to make
herringbone gears. That eliminates axial thrust while keeping the benefits of
helical gears. Machining them in one piece is quite a tricky operation.
Herringbone gear - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| |
| | | | |
25 matches
Mail list logo